It has always been the plan to have Biden as our "president"
(media.greatawakening.win)
?? Theory ??
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (168)
sorted by:
Strange thought:
post-POTUS means "after President of the United States"
One interpretation: There is no president anymore.
How do you 'safeguard' US elections when there is no president anymore?
Answer:
The next question is a natural question after that line: "How do you 'remove' foreign interference and corruption and install US-owned voter ID law(s) and other safeguards?"
This has been the perennial challenge! Before Reconstruction, the states ran their own elections however they saw fit. If they allowed foreign countries to interfere, that was on them. I guess the president could do something to end the foreign influence, but we know for a fact there WAS foreign influence and no one seemed to care too much (France, England). The XYZ affair (look it up) exposed a major weakness with our system: We were becoming just as corrupt as Europe!
After Reconstructions, the following major changes were made:
Do we need a constitutional amendment to mandate Voter ID everywhere, and no foreign interference? Probably. But a carefully written law and a sympathetic SCOTUS could allow congress to more or less pre-empt that based on what is already in the constitution since Reconstruction.
The reality is, however, that states administer their own elections, and there is no two ways about that. Federal interference in state elections has inevitably weakened the ability of the states to control their own elections and free the people from foreign interference. How hard it is to remove a single name from the voter rolls! Why? SCOTUS! How hard it is to even investigate voter or election fraud!!! Why? SCOTUS!!
I think we have arrived at the point where it is impossible to fix the elections, impossible to have a fair election, and impossible to untangle this Gordian knot. What do we have to do?