The biggest one is the JFK Jr. stuff in the 10th video of the 1st series. I've heard other anons say there is other info in the series that has been debunked by anons.
Overall though the series is still mostly true. Just be mindful to research any items learned from the series on your own so you are confident it is true. The narrator states to do this as well so you should be good.
If you disagree about whether or not Jr. Is alive certainly does not mean her stating that is an error. And then saying other anons said there was info debunked by other anons really is no proof of anything at all. I agree people should use discernment when watching or listening to any body of work, but you have totally not made your case that there are "errors". In fact you have put forth your opinion and heresay. I personally think she has done an excellent job and her work would stand up to any accusation of "errors".
There are errors in this series too. But the good greatly outweighs the minor mistakes, which one can certainly unpack for oneself down the road when the picture becomes clearer.
Use discernment, there are errors in the first series.
Still good overall.
Could you share what some of those errors are? I just started watching last night and would be good to know. Thanks!
The biggest one is the JFK Jr. stuff in the 10th video of the 1st series. I've heard other anons say there is other info in the series that has been debunked by anons. Overall though the series is still mostly true. Just be mindful to research any items learned from the series on your own so you are confident it is true. The narrator states to do this as well so you should be good.
If you disagree about whether or not Jr. Is alive certainly does not mean her stating that is an error. And then saying other anons said there was info debunked by other anons really is no proof of anything at all. I agree people should use discernment when watching or listening to any body of work, but you have totally not made your case that there are "errors". In fact you have put forth your opinion and heresay. I personally think she has done an excellent job and her work would stand up to any accusation of "errors".
I consider it an error when it directly contradicts what Q has already said about JFK Jr.
I am simply repeating what the narrator of the video states: research yourself and don't take it all on blind faith.
The time travel stuff is given more credence than it deserves, IMO, but it is eye opening.
Yea it all makes sense to me.
There are errors in this series too. But the good greatly outweighs the minor mistakes, which one can certainly unpack for oneself down the road when the picture becomes clearer.
"Use discernment" is the ultimate advice.
This is my feeling with it as well. Overall very good, but definitely some errors.