I stated this the other day on the site formally known as TDW.
Imagine you are at a friends house hanging out one night and their 4 year old son comes running down the stairs crying about the Boogie Man being under his bed.
Now normally you would expect your friend and his wife to console the child telling him there is no such thing as the Boogie Man.
Now imagine instead of consoling the child the mom grabs some lighter fluid and the dad grabs a gun. They run upstairs light the bed on fire and shoot 10 rounds in to it. That would make most wonder what the hell do they know about the Boogie Man that I do not.
Now this is what I am seeing form the left on Q. They are lighting the bed and shooting over and over.
Not just the test pilots... pretty much everyone involved in the project would have to be in on it. Everyone at mission control, all the manufacturers, programmers, engineers, researches etc. Literally thousands and thousands of people.
And yet nobody's come out after all this time. It's so obvious that it's not fake, it's pretty ridiculous just how obvious it is.
hahahah dude did you read the comments on some people here saying it was fake?? what about me saying you can go buy a telescope and see with your own eyes we have been there. the rover is there.... how in the hell do you disprove that .
I've heard some of the claims made for proving the Moon landing is fake and they read a lot like flat-earth theory. Mostly claims solely based on not understanding how stuff works.
Like "the flag was waving"... but there's no air resistance so it keeps on waving for a long time after the force used to put it in the ground
Or "speed up the video and it looks like they're jumping on earth"... well yeah, that doesn't prove anything.
"There's no glass crater after the capsule launches from the Moon back to the orbiter"... the thrust needed is barely anything to get it off the Moon because gravity is so weak... so it wasn't powerful enough to turn the sand to glass.
"There's no stars visible in the pictures"... the exposure needed to see the stars would mean that you'd just be looking at a pure white photo because of the shine from the Moon
... etc., not that different to flat-earth stuff honestly
Really? You are telling me that they took a beach buggy to the moon.
Why?
Have you seen how small the lunar module is? Where did they keep the buggy? Does it make sense to you that they would want to take a car to the moon? Not even a vehicle with a moon-specific design. No, they took something that Homer Simpson would approve of.
If they had to unfold it and put it together, I hope IKEA had nothing to do with it.
And where did they drive it? For what purpose? So that we would never forget how important to our lifestyles General Motors is?
The whole thing is simply ridiculous.