If the evidence were presented in the SCOTUS, interested, research-oriented Americans would pay attention and some would tune in. A few interested foreigners would follow the SCOTUS proceedings.
But the second trial of Donald John Trump in the United States Senate will be riveting for much of the industrial world. Many millions will be glued to the proceedings. They will follow it day by day as the horrors of the cabal are revealed.
And the incredibly stupid people who are sponsoring this great world circus don't even realize what an immense favor they are doing us. President Trump gets discovery. He can lead the trial into all the election crimes and the Biden family crimes. Those touch on the DNC and the Clintons and thence to U1 and the Awan spy-ring-in-Congress scandal, CIA drug trafficking and the Mina airport. It all will be revealed with a worldwide audience.
It's the firecracker in their ridiculous house of crime cards. The whole thing gets blown off the table.
The criminal class is in for a rough February. It's going to be something to watch. Stock up on popcorn early, there's going to be a run on the grocery stores.
The trial is because of "citing an insurrection" on Jan. 6, right? They can show evidence that Antifa, BLM, Pelosi, the Capitol police, etc. organized it, but how can you provide sex trafficking and election fraud evidence? I don't see how this will be the venue to present all of that. And I don't think there will be enough people watching and paying attention. I still think we have to see the EBS take over the airwaves so it interrupts the casual disinterested viewer so they have to pay attention. And with Leahy in charge, I'm sure he will quash any topics that stray from the issue at hand. And if you start naming names, including sitting Republicans, will that make them more likely to impeach or less likely? I can see Leahy throwing out the rules and calling for a vote right off the bat or before any of the real evidence has been presented.
They said the insurrection was because Trump 'lying' about election fraud. Well, let's find out if he's lying or not. Only way to do that is produce evidence, which it has not been produced.