I could have sworn they delayed it until Jan 22 a while back in order to "avoid getting political." Has that begun? Anybody have any info about it yet?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (8)
sorted by:
They held a vote on if it should be allowed to proceed, it was 15 NO to only 6 YES.
The case was thus dismissed as moot.
Who's "they?" Aren't there only 9 Justices? Do you have a link to that story?
they did election type vote counting duhhhhhhh