From what was reported overheard outside a closed room Roberts' essential argument against hearing the Texas case was that it would incite to riot. That argument means he based his decision on the force of a rioting populace rather than on the law. Further he urged his colleagues to adopt his argument and vote with him. That is treasonous dereliction of duty and failure to uphold his oath of office.
The penalty for these crimes is serious and if Roberts is convicted in an impeachment trial of by a military tribunal he will face the penalty.
From what was reported overheard outside a closed room Roberts' essential argument against hearing the Texas case was that it would incite to riot. That argument means he based his decision on the force of a rioting populace rather than on the law. Further he urged his colleagues to adopt his argument and vote with him. That is treasonous dereliction of duty and failure to uphold his oath of office.
The penalty for these crimes is serious and if Roberts is convicted in an impeachment trial of by a military tribunal he will face the penalty.
What a tangled web . . .