I agree with you!! But my point is: 1) Normies trust well-schooled but not well-educated guys such as PhDs. 2) Most well-schooled but not well-educated guys such as PhDs are leftists, who won't give a .. to Q theories. 3) My buddy PhD is a pede who believes in Q theories. 4) Even my buddy PhD finds it difficult to agree with the content of this video. See the problem here bro!?
All right, all right.. If you think that I am a LARP, it's really up to you.. I was just trying to avoid directly revealing identity whether my buddy or me myself is the buddy that I refer to.. And my point is not about who is smarter!! My point is about whether the information would be easy for the general public to accept. It is a communication tactic issue. For example, the video like https://rumble.com/vbd957-q-the-plan-to-save-the-world-1080p60.html is quite viewer friendly. And podcast hosts such as Dave of X22 Report are quite good at narrating the Q stories. If there are real secrets that can be leaked out with traceable sources of information on the ongoing battles against the Cabal, it may be a better idea to let those podcast hosts to organize the content and clues of the story and broadcast to the public. Military professionals may also do the job well if they or you guys can utilize the language in an appropriate manner to target the audience!
In today's society, many hold a relativistic world view. If a viewer is not convinced that your info is correct, s/he wouldn't care if your info is correct or not. You can't force a viewer to accept your info. Like what I said, me and my buddy pede are not convinced the info presented in the video is correct. How and why should we assume the presented info is correct? If we are not that convinced, how can you convince the normies? Look, I am really trying to help. If you are still mad at me, so be it.. God Bless..
I agree with you!! But my point is: 1) Normies trust well-schooled but not well-educated guys such as PhDs. 2) Most well-schooled but not well-educated guys such as PhDs are leftists, who won't give a .. to Q theories. 3) My buddy PhD is a pede who believes in Q theories. 4) Even my buddy PhD finds it difficult to agree with the content of this video. See the problem here bro!?
All right, all right.. If you think that I am a LARP, it's really up to you.. I was just trying to avoid directly revealing identity whether my buddy or me myself is the buddy that I refer to.. And my point is not about who is smarter!! My point is about whether the information would be easy for the general public to accept. It is a communication tactic issue. For example, the video like https://rumble.com/vbd957-q-the-plan-to-save-the-world-1080p60.html is quite viewer friendly. And podcast hosts such as Dave of X22 Report are quite good at narrating the Q stories. If there are real secrets that can be leaked out with traceable sources of information on the ongoing battles against the Cabal, it may be a better idea to let those podcast hosts to organize the content and clues of the story and broadcast to the public. Military professionals may also do the job well if they or you guys can utilize the language in an appropriate manner to target the audience!
In today's society, many hold a relativistic world view. If a viewer is not convinced that your info is correct, s/he wouldn't care if your info is correct or not. You can't force a viewer to accept your info. Like what I said, me and my buddy pede are not convinced the info presented in the video is correct. How and why should we assume the presented info is correct? If we are not that convinced, how can you convince the normies? Look, I am really trying to help. If you are still mad at me, so be it.. God Bless..