Hello my fellow patriots. I know this is something that seems to be accepted but I saw some debate about it earlier today. I have done research on this and came across this website and the person has done some really great research on it and provides a sufficient amount of evidence and references: https://write-aholic.com/why-didnt-biden-get-a-presidential-battery-salute/
Biden did not receive a Presidential 21-gun salute.
From my own findings here is what I found that I didn't see in the article above: During ceremonies, the platoon fires 3-inch antitank guns mounted on a 105-mm howitzer chassis. Three-man crews, consisting of a watchman (time keeper), loader and gunner, fire at intervals from three to eight seconds, depending on the type of ceremony. from: https://home.army.mil/jbmhh/index.php/teamJBMHH/units-tenants/TOG/presidential-salute-battery
Only two were fired for Biden. The intervals were not 3-8 seconds. That was not a standard Presidential 21 Gun Salute.
I can't tell what I'm dealing with here, because you've completely ignored the point. A regulation is not the metric. Please screenshot me your result so I know how to tailor a reply:
https://test.mensa.no/
I'm not implying you are retarded, but I want you to understand there are different ways to walk you through this depending on where on the bell curve you are. I don't want to insult you by tailoring too low, but neither do I want this to continue to go over your head by tailoring too high. And neither of us have the patience to go through things another three or four times as I zero in on the right way to explain this. Just take the test, don't you want to know anyways?
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence,
Military regulations are layered like onions.
The document you link, which I had already read specifies 3 second intervals, 5 second intervals, but never 9 second intervals (3-3), yet here we are with 9 second intervals. What gives? Does the military just not care? No, it's because we don't have the docs for Arlington, or for the 3rd infantry, or for anything else we can't even know that we don't know exist. Which is why you can't point to this one document and ignore the video evidence.
We have clear convention, which whether we have the regs for or not implies a given regulation of battery number and interval. You do not falsify the premise by noting an absence of supporting regulation (absence of the regs is not evidence the reg does not exist) but by finding evidence contrary to the convention; where are the videos of Obama, or Regan, on Bush getting 2+1@9sec salutes? Where are the videos of foreign dignitaries receiving 3+1@3sec salutes?
Do you understand everything I just wrote? If you won't take the test (even for your own purposes) can you summarize my argument back to me? Summarize my argument and we'll go from there.