This may be a flimsy theory but I was just thinking, what if "standing" is just a red herring?
Is it possible that due to the influence of a foreign power in this case, the issue isn't that the plaintiffs in the case lack standing, but that the courts themselves lack jurisdiction?
Q always said the military was the only way--is it possible that military courts are the only way too when election fraud involves foreign actors?
11.3, 11.4 DoD manual on war. Cannons shot at "Inauguration " were for a foreign dignitary. All the "illegal" activity did not apply because we have been under enemy occupation for a long time. Civilian laws do not apply to the occupiers. Military laws do. I think you ha e it correct. The more I look at the Q plan since the beginning. Everything has been planned and accomplished behind the scenes, then public notified after the fact, for the maximum show. Competing with MSM covering and playing against it all. I don't know about y'all, but I am ready to pop some popcorn and watch the show. Think OJ trial. Exponentially. Boom. 17. 3 movies going at once.....right. How to gain maximum redpilling.....is it happening already...without the 3 films?
I'm ready but I'm cautious about getting my hopes up for when it will happen. Right now my heart is hoping for Jan 30 or Feb 1st but i'm prepared to wait until March 4. I don't want to, but it's that or depression.