This may be a flimsy theory but I was just thinking, what if "standing" is just a red herring?
Is it possible that due to the influence of a foreign power in this case, the issue isn't that the plaintiffs in the case lack standing, but that the courts themselves lack jurisdiction?
Q always said the military was the only way--is it possible that military courts are the only way too when election fraud involves foreign actors?
I was expecting to see action on the 20th. Now I am just trying to understand the best possible scenario going forward. I still trust the plan, and maube there was a hiccup that derailed that action temporarily, or the plan is beyond what I see or can guess. But I can't see this going on much longer at all. Not four years. Not four months. I agree that would allow way too much damage to be done. I don't see this continuing for longer than a few weeks, if that. But again, just my supposition.