This may be a flimsy theory but I was just thinking, what if "standing" is just a red herring?
Is it possible that due to the influence of a foreign power in this case, the issue isn't that the plaintiffs in the case lack standing, but that the courts themselves lack jurisdiction?
Q always said the military was the only way--is it possible that military courts are the only way too when election fraud involves foreign actors?
This is a much funner game we're playing right now?
Agreed.
I think we may be looking at that too simply though. If they had stated there evidence at the time then the cases might have gone to trial based on those facts.
However, Q has always said that it is bigger than this. We need to trust that Giuliani and the lawyers were simply keeping their powder dry for the next level events.