This may be a flimsy theory but I was just thinking, what if "standing" is just a red herring?
Is it possible that due to the influence of a foreign power in this case, the issue isn't that the plaintiffs in the case lack standing, but that the courts themselves lack jurisdiction?
Q always said the military was the only way--is it possible that military courts are the only way too when election fraud involves foreign actors?
His other point was that they didn’t care about getting lower court arguments thrown out in order to rush it to SC...which makes ZERO sense because SC considers what was presented at the ACTUAL CASE when deciding to take an appeal of a case or not.