Think! How would you set up a perfect defeat of someone claiming election fraud?
Your lure them into taking an action for which you already know the outcome.
For example, A makes big stick about need to audit of votes. B objects, does everything possible to prevent audit to the point of validating the need for audit. B has already cooked the data, and know that audit will not affect results.
Finally, they appear to lose the battle, when it was be design, and A does audit, which results in no change to outcome. A's claim of election fraud are delegitimized here and everywhere else.
Think! How would you set up a perfect defeat of someone claiming election fraud?
Your lure them into taking an action for which you already know the outcome.
For example, A makes big stick about need to audit of votes. B objects, does everything possible to prevent audit to the point of validating the need for audit. B has already cooked the data, and know that audit will not affect results.
Finally, they appear to lose the battle, when it was be design, and A does audit, which results in no change to outcome. A's claim of election fraud are delegitimized here and everywhere else.
Our enemies are familiar with Sun Tzu also.