Rand Paul says Trump impeachment case is 'DEAD ON ARRIVAL' after 45 senators support his motion to declare trial unconstitutional - The Great Awakening

492

Rand Paul says Trump impeachment case is 'DEAD ON ARRIVAL' after 45 senators support his motion to declare trial unconstitutional

posted 3 years ago by Insignificant 3 years ago by Insignificant +493 / -1

The question is: will they allow evidence of election fraud to be presented?

https://www.rt.com/usa/513714-senate-lacks-impeachment-votes/

31 comments

31 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (31)

sorted by:

▲ 8 ▼

– deleted 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

▲ 9 ▼

– mac1221 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0

I believe in order for the Senate to actually to remove a president or keep them from holding further office would require 67 Senators - 2/3 majority. Handcuffing Trump and making a public statement is what they want. But, the Dems and RINOs don't have the votes. That is why Paul can say dead on arrival. More DC theatrics since the cannot do any real work.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– JustinSonOfFidel 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

What about the lady from Hawaii who republicans have a crush on, tulsi? Is she impeaching?

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– citypeople 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

She didn't run again. Is out of Washington. She seemed to hate it there.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– Modpapa 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

She is a house rep, not a senator

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q