I'm still new to this whole Q thing. I haven't read all the posts. They're so cryptic, and I don't have 3 years to slowly be fed the drops and research them all.
But I read the stuff on Snowden, and I never thought about him not being a good guys. It's super suspicious that the mainstream media and even Hollywood portray him as a hero, which is a huge red flag I never even noticed....
He's on Rogan MULTIPLE times.
No one is trying to censor this guy or his mission!!
His mission seems to be whistleblow on "NSA BAD" ..... while he's secretly a CIA Operative trying to get NSA dissolved.
So, NSA are good, according to Q? After 2020, it feels like every 3 letter agency is evil, corrupt, and against the people. It would be nice to know there was at least 1 that had good guys.
I'm not British! How dare you! I'm a proud Texan! Why should those British cunts be the only ones who can use the word cunt, huh?!! It's such a versatile word, like fuck or shit!
KEK
Anyways, the problem with Q posts is that they require research to give them context and meaning. For people who have already and have that in their memory, reading through Q posts is much more "profitable" than for someone who hasn't researched them. Q asks questions a lot, reading a question isn't beneficial without the research to answer it. I'm new here, and so are a lot of people. This is one of the biggest problems with you older Q people, telling people to "just read through the posts". You need to understand where you're coming from and where others are coming from.
I'm still new to this whole Q thing. I haven't read all the posts. They're so cryptic, and I don't have 3 years to slowly be fed the drops and research them all.
But I read the stuff on Snowden, and I never thought about him not being a good guys. It's super suspicious that the mainstream media and even Hollywood portray him as a hero, which is a huge red flag I never even noticed....
He's on Rogan MULTIPLE times. No one is trying to censor this guy or his mission!! His mission seems to be whistleblow on "NSA BAD" ..... while he's secretly a CIA Operative trying to get NSA dissolved.
So, NSA are good, according to Q? After 2020, it feels like every 3 letter agency is evil, corrupt, and against the people. It would be nice to know there was at least 1 that had good guys.
Any agency under NSA Act of 1947 that could conceal their activities under “National Security” ran off rails. That’s how any giant cookie jar works.
Entire reason the OSS was disbanded was Allen Dulles wanted Carte Blanche to make his own Secret Police w Paramilitary Black Agenda / Budget.
What the fuck js going to happen when you give bankers the ability to act in secret and answer to nobody?
Hmm.
1947 they green light.
1963 they bust a cap in JFK and coup complete.
NSA is MIL. CIA is not.
Theoretically.... enter Space Force.
You don't have time to read a book? HIGHLY advise you read Q all the way through and then read it again. No TL;DR.
I'm dyslexic and a very slow reader. Literally tires me out to read just a little.
Ironically I am a programmer, and I can read code all day long, as long as I'm the one who wrote it.
Hence why I am asking for people's feedback and input. Don't be a cunt.
Use a screen reader, put on headphones, and listen. Not being a "cunt". What are you British?
I'm not British! How dare you! I'm a proud Texan! Why should those British cunts be the only ones who can use the word cunt, huh?!! It's such a versatile word, like fuck or shit!
KEK
Anyways, the problem with Q posts is that they require research to give them context and meaning. For people who have already and have that in their memory, reading through Q posts is much more "profitable" than for someone who hasn't researched them. Q asks questions a lot, reading a question isn't beneficial without the research to answer it. I'm new here, and so are a lot of people. This is one of the biggest problems with you older Q people, telling people to "just read through the posts". You need to understand where you're coming from and where others are coming from.