Shes significantly better than the rest of them, despite being far from perfect. Shes literally speaking out against the major players in the takeover, bud. Trying do blacklist potential allies in at least PART of this fight is a bad move.
Yes yes, we've all seen it.
Edit: WEF is bad, Soros is bad. We are clear on that yeah? Ok, lets move on to present day reality. Her bio on there doesnt mean SHE is directly Soros funded. It means that at one point (but not anymore) she took part in WEF and now they use her photo to boost their own cred. Could it potentially mean more? Sure. Could it potentially mean jack shit now that she literally QUIT the democrat party and went scorched earth on some of their sacred cows? Its a possibility, and if youre acting like you KNOW either way, youre lying.
Shes significantly better than the rest of them, despite being far from perfect. Shes literally speaking out against the major players in the takeover, bud. Trying do blacklist potential allies in at least PART of this fight is a bad move.
Yes yes, we've all seen it. Edit: WEF is bad, Soros is bad. We are clear on that yeah? Ok, lets move on to present day reality. Her bio on there doesnt mean SHE is directly Soros funded. It means that at one point (but not anymore) she took part in WEF and now they use her photo to boost their own cred. Could it potentially mean more? Sure. Could it potentially mean jack shit now that she literally QUIT the democrat party and went scorched earth on some of their sacred cows? Its a possibility, and if youre acting like you KNOW either way, youre lying.
Interesting that you cut half the sentence off youre quoting. Now why would you do that?
That doesnt even make sense in this context. Shes literally going after our enemies. Maybe youre a pawn tricked into creating unproductive divisions.
Yeah, and she will likely make more dumb calls. The rebuke of Brennan and Schiff and big tech isnt one of them.
So did Ted, Rand, etc.
Just remember that.