Biden was getting creamed everywhere, and then boom, six states stopped counting at the same time?, kicked out counters, boarded up windows, pulled in boxes and bags of fake ballots, rescanned stacks of ballots multiple times, and what do you know, in all ofthose states (and more - hello Virginia et al), he squeaked by with slim margins that were a fraction of the (statistically insurmountable) deficits that he was trailing by before they “stopped counting.” And these tiny leads only held up through documented threatening of families, removal of evidence, stonewalling of hearings, and dogged blocking of forensic audits of the paper ballots.
If you can’t admit that this election wasn’t blatantly stolen, I don’t particularly care that you’re lying to us. But you’re 100% lying to yourself. And you already know this.
It's because the cases I believe were more about the illegal ways the states were conducting the election. Removing people from observing isnt fraud necessarily by definition but the states were breaking the laws to cheat. Its not all about vote switching which is another story
Sidney Powells's cases were specifically targeting Dominion. Trying to prove that was probably going to be more involved than the blatant obvious voter/election fraud that happened by what BasedInFact already said above. That's why Trump sent her on her own(not ass with team anymore) to go tackle that problem. Not sure what or why Giuliani would says we're not trying to prove fraud..because there was fraud coming out of this election's ears. Possibly some small part of one case that they weren't alleging fraud but an election rule change the democrats made just prior to the election that allowed mass mailing ballots and there shouldn't have been. So that wasn't about fraud per say..it was more about illegally changing the election laws so the democrats would gain favor.
I thought Dominion evidence was discussed at hearings including one in which they connected real time to a voting machine that wasn't supposed to be connected to the internet.
I also thought the courts outright refused to hear any argument on the matter.
You obviously have more legal understanding than I do, so you may be right, but it seems as though the courts were stacked against exposing this from the get go
He didn't win those counties by a lot. They cheated by a lot.
Sworn affidavits, videos, and statistical improbabilities in addition to other anomalies prove this is fact.
Didn’t change the result?!?!
Biden was getting creamed everywhere, and then boom, six states stopped counting at the same time?, kicked out counters, boarded up windows, pulled in boxes and bags of fake ballots, rescanned stacks of ballots multiple times, and what do you know, in all ofthose states (and more - hello Virginia et al), he squeaked by with slim margins that were a fraction of the (statistically insurmountable) deficits that he was trailing by before they “stopped counting.” And these tiny leads only held up through documented threatening of families, removal of evidence, stonewalling of hearings, and dogged blocking of forensic audits of the paper ballots.
If you can’t admit that this election wasn’t blatantly stolen, I don’t particularly care that you’re lying to us. But you’re 100% lying to yourself. And you already know this.
Ok, fine, we get it.
Willful obliviousness is the shill strategy of the day.
It is. Keep digging. It was quite blatant. Especially with the vote flipping.
Dominion was corrupt.
It's because the cases I believe were more about the illegal ways the states were conducting the election. Removing people from observing isnt fraud necessarily by definition but the states were breaking the laws to cheat. Its not all about vote switching which is another story
Sidney Powells's cases were specifically targeting Dominion. Trying to prove that was probably going to be more involved than the blatant obvious voter/election fraud that happened by what BasedInFact already said above. That's why Trump sent her on her own(not ass with team anymore) to go tackle that problem. Not sure what or why Giuliani would says we're not trying to prove fraud..because there was fraud coming out of this election's ears. Possibly some small part of one case that they weren't alleging fraud but an election rule change the democrats made just prior to the election that allowed mass mailing ballots and there shouldn't have been. So that wasn't about fraud per say..it was more about illegally changing the election laws so the democrats would gain favor.
I thought Dominion evidence was discussed at hearings including one in which they connected real time to a voting machine that wasn't supposed to be connected to the internet.
I also thought the courts outright refused to hear any argument on the matter.
You obviously have more legal understanding than I do, so you may be right, but it seems as though the courts were stacked against exposing this from the get go
How about stopping the election counting in swing states simultaneously and then 100000 votes appearing for Biden at 3 am? Lol