I've been skeptical of Q and Trump still being President but how do we explain this?
(copyrightlately.com)
Comments (28)
sorted by:
So long as Trump’s “Office of the Former President” continues to recognize that he’s the former president and doesn’t falsely suggest that he’s the current president, its use of the seal shouldn’t run afoul of the law.
LMAO Leftist getting BFTO again.
Seventeen feather points on each wing, as his personal seal had. Regular GS has 16. But Trump's presidential seal has a broken ribbon and the eagle is holding the "out of many" part. In this new seal the ribbon is intact.
There’s still no hard sauce that the document in that article is legit and truly from Trump.
FWIW Jenna Ellis, his lawyer, shared and commented on it as if it were real on social media
Link?
Provide a couple of links to the Boston Herald article on this in the comments below. Published January 26, 2021 at 7:35 p.m. Replied in the wrong place.
Image from Boston Herald hot link from article below, first line below article title being, "The address 45office.com is not spam" image is shown
Boston Herald article "Trump sends out new email with more to come"
Well I don’t. Some do, though.
A lot of fake news flying around right now so I am being cautious.
good clean fun - the left is still getting trolled by Trump
Of course it's legal. It's simply not the seal of the prresident of the corporate united states. It looks like the original seal I think called. Dorset or Dorsett seal.
Being former president doesn't mean he can't be current. If he handed the reins of government over to the military for the purpose of clearing up the confusion since the courts wanted nothing to do with it, he can be re-installed as president should the military determine him to be the rightful winner of the 2020 election.
He never conceded.
Just a question: Where is the original link to this "office" - I only saw citations and copies! Can anybody post a link to the Office of DJT?
I believe it isnt him. No way he would say that.
Haa haa haaa... off topic, even so far as the OP thread. You hoisted yourself onto your own petard. I'll take "ironic reversal, or poetic justice" for a thousand Alex.
Blocked cuz I got no time for derps.
Do ya really have to ask? All the perks of POTUS none of the headaches. They can and do whatever they want. Especially Obi the One the king of shadow governance with his trusty side kick Val Jar.
So far as the OP's article, who gives a fuck? How do "we" explain this? We don't need to. The whole fucking thing is off topic for this forum anyways because it has nothing to do with Q.
Take it and your snark elsewhere. You think at this point POTUS cares about "impeachable levels?" You're the moron.
Responding to an OP... and as long as the mods see fit to allow all the bull shit floating 'round here for the past few days... what of it? I need no "defense" to reply. Personal attacks are the sign of a weak mind. What you got to gain here fren? Other than snark cuz you're frustrated. You answered too Mr. Big Stuff. so I guess we're in the same boat by your standards though we do not agree. Breathe and get a blow job. You might feel better.
OOOooohhhhhh, I get it now. Just checked your profile... so much to say.... Sooooooooooooo deficient on topics and sauce. All you got for submissions is the UK Daily Mail bro'? Sub par dude and really in your case a mind is a terrible thing. Not to waste but to share. 11.4 Marker ...Romans 11.4 (www.dailymail.co.uk)
You do realize, that you went off topic askin' if Obama and Bush are still "Presidents" right? Yet here you are.... still. Clarity of expression, brilliance and/or luminosity based on your history is something akin to taking the log out of your own eye.
You would do best to apply yourself to a submission history rather than your comment history... but somehow I think that is unlikely.