newbies, please increase your mental agility just a tad.... we talk of Q as an entity, NOT AS A PERSON. Q+ is a person... Q is "a group of less than 10, mostly military"... yes, there are underlings... do they know they are working for Q???? no friggin idea. I would assume so BUT, when trying to keep a secret, the more people who know, the more likely the secret won't be kept.
We, AS ANONS (Some claim the title of Pedes (centipedes)... or Qcumbers (more of a joke... trump saying he loves Qcumbers), we follow Q... meaning we look for drops and follow the crumbs to their enlightening bits of data we can learn from digging... we take said bits of data and "bake" "bread", meaning create a proof and disseminate the truth to others.... Sauce means proof of our findings....
easy enough to follow...
as bakers or just anons who learn and spread that knowledge, we can miss the point or even be off by degrees but we ARE ON THE SAME SIDE... as can be gleaned by our being here...
WWG1WGA - Where we go one we go all... a slogan if you will... from white squall but more significantly was on the bell on JFKs boat.
Now please, PLEASE, stop asking who Q is. That stupid ass question and "who is Qanon", are only meant for msm to ask... ask a thousand times and i will say the same thing EVERY F'N TIME... Who is Q? Q is no one... Who is Qanon or what is Qanon??? nothing. It doesn't exist...
we are not Qanons... we are Anons... anonymous ... we research Q drops...
understand?????
As a relative newbie--some thoughts. First, I agree that it's completely stupid and a waste of time to ask who Q is (though we can't HELP but speculate), and even dumber to ask who "Qanon" is, for all the reasons that have already been discussed. I expect that the vast majority of those who ask this are either MSM or shills, though some people undoubtedly are asking a genuine question. We DO NOT KNOW, and we SHOULD NOT KNOW who the person who posts as Q actually is. ECW has already, evidently, been stalked and put through all kinds of professional and social hassle due to the rumors (correct or otherwise, we obviously don't know) that he is Q. That really saddens me, as we have every indication that he's a solid patriot who is now having to do damage control in his life, as so many other patriots are as well. We also know that the Q mission is planned and executed by a team, along with Trump (Q+), and they direct an untold number of people in their various roles, each of whom undoubtedly has various degrees of awareness or unawareness regarding the plan they are working out. Less than 10 have the FULL picture, but lots more people must have bigger pieces of the picture than we have or it couldn't be done. All that being said, I still think it's perfectly fair and reasonable, in the course of natural conversation, to refer to "Q" (the person with whom we communicate) as a single person, even though that person clearly represents a larger team. Hopefully, we'll be able to have our curiosity satisfied at some point, but for now, speculating on it more than with a passing thought is a waste of time and energy, unhelpful to completing the mission. I do completely agree with you, though, that the misuse of the term "Qanon" makes me cringe and generally denotes ignorance or insult on the part of the user. The exception, I think, is in referring to the mission or movement as a whole: "the Qanon mission", as this is not naming one entity or the other but is focusing on how the two parts work together. Just my perspectives as someone who is very much still learning but is catching up on the basics. :o)