Yeah, Lin Wood posted this a moment ago but it seems dated. In the US, we only have Pfizer and Moderna, which don't have MRC-5 or any other aborted-fetus cell line AFAIK, because they're not vaccines. They're encapsulated modRNA intended to cause your cells to create spike proteins for the ostensible purpose of making them better at fighting SARS-CoV-2; the makers describe them as software. This makes MRC-5 a straw man, easily debunked by the doctor; MRC-5 comes from just one of many "lucky" immortalized aborted babies.

I'd like it better if the card said "I take legal exception to injections containing any aborted cell lines or that risk iatrogenic reactions" based on its legal theory. It'd be nice if there were a legal theory to object to all genetic material injections (e.g., chimpanzee cells in ChAdOx1). Refusal should always be reasonable.