You have the isolation of a virus that isn't genetic sequencing/electron microscopy?
Just give me that right now and we can end my Koch postulations.
Prove earth is flat - Natural physics of water dictate earth is flat.
Provide one single example of water bending convexly around the exterior of a shape.
Or gas pressure without a container.
No example of these things on a scale other than the planetary, and you don't have science, you have pseudo science. Science is repeatable, measurable, observable.
the scientific method is a rigid method of testing to deal with cause and effect, you cannot manipulate magical forces to see if items rise or fall based on the manipulation of said magical forces, you can however manipulate the density of an object and watch it rise or fall, this is testable, observable, repeatable, you can not manipulate the 'gravity' of an object..
that's why there is no verifiable experiment that proves gravity, the Cavendish falls fart at the very first step post hypothesis; NO independent variable..little g isn't up for debate, the gravitational constant we don't dispute, we dispute big G, the claimed causality of that rate of acceleration.
You have the isolation of a virus that isn't genetic sequencing/electron microscopy?
Just give me that right now and we can end my Koch postulations.
Prove earth is flat - Natural physics of water dictate earth is flat.
Provide one single example of water bending convexly around the exterior of a shape.
Or gas pressure without a container.
No example of these things on a scale other than the planetary, and you don't have science, you have pseudo science. Science is repeatable, measurable, observable.
the scientific method is a rigid method of testing to deal with cause and effect, you cannot manipulate magical forces to see if items rise or fall based on the manipulation of said magical forces, you can however manipulate the density of an object and watch it rise or fall, this is testable, observable, repeatable, you can not manipulate the 'gravity' of an object..
that's why there is no verifiable experiment that proves gravity, the Cavendish falls fart at the very first step post hypothesis; NO independent variable..little g isn't up for debate, the gravitational constant we don't dispute, we dispute big G, the claimed causality of that rate of acceleration.
I'll wait.
I'll pm you the documents.