Byrne is posting his story on deepcapture.com and the data is useful. He seems to have been helpful but to be getting less inner-circle info than Lindell.
His theory appears to be that we should've had the military ballot long ago and that would've been a 3-foot putt. He apparently is not following the full logic of several more important human-rights objectives for this operation as hinted by Sec. Pompeo in his genocide finding of 1/19. It is important for the team to allow differing perspectives because deception in wartime has moral justification when your people's lives are at stake and all diplomatic attempts to negotiate have been rejected.
Not saying he's in the know... but for a long time people where calling him a liar and saying the exact opposite of what he was saying was true... so maybe he's just playing on that fact... the exact opposite of that statement would be "Q is real. Dont take my word look into it yourself"
I saw on another post that this was a comment on a retweet and is therefore out of context. I'm not a huge fan of Byrne in anyway, but I'd like to see the tweet he was originally commenting on to see if this was by chance a sarcastic remark.
Although many people in the Q movement have become "followers" and neglected their duty to do real research on topics outlined in the Q post, there is no reason to say Q is total bullshit unless you are ignorant of what Q is all about or trying to discredit the movement because it is impacting your own agenda.
I used to think he was the real deal. But unless this is massively deliberate disinfo on his part, my trust for him is finally eroded. He has a big mouth, a bit too big for someone who wants us to trust and listen to him.
Byrne is posting his story on deepcapture.com and the data is useful. He seems to have been helpful but to be getting less inner-circle info than Lindell.
His theory appears to be that we should've had the military ballot long ago and that would've been a 3-foot putt. He apparently is not following the full logic of several more important human-rights objectives for this operation as hinted by Sec. Pompeo in his genocide finding of 1/19. It is important for the team to allow differing perspectives because deception in wartime has moral justification when your people's lives are at stake and all diplomatic attempts to negotiate have been rejected.
Not saying he's in the know... but for a long time people where calling him a liar and saying the exact opposite of what he was saying was true... so maybe he's just playing on that fact... the exact opposite of that statement would be "Q is real. Dont take my word look into it yourself"
Why is this coming up again? He is a famefag nothing else.
Wow what is this? Is this really him or is twitter using his old account?
That’s unfortunate...bummer....now I need to search for some hopium.
I saw on another post that this was a comment on a retweet and is therefore out of context. I'm not a huge fan of Byrne in anyway, but I'd like to see the tweet he was originally commenting on to see if this was by chance a sarcastic remark.
Although many people in the Q movement have become "followers" and neglected their duty to do real research on topics outlined in the Q post, there is no reason to say Q is total bullshit unless you are ignorant of what Q is all about or trying to discredit the movement because it is impacting your own agenda.
Ignore it, part of the information war.
he's a douche, no doubt
Or playing a role?
possible, but I would bet grifter
I used to think he was the real deal. But unless this is massively deliberate disinfo on his part, my trust for him is finally eroded. He has a big mouth, a bit too big for someone who wants us to trust and listen to him.
Rudy and Sydney aren't part of the Q team either. It's a group of less than 10 that has most likely shrunk instead of expanded.