Qpost 4 Oct 29, 2017 states "What SC decision opened the door for a sitting President to activate - what must be showed?"

Searching through past cases I've found possible canidates but nothing that really sticks out IMO.

Q told us early on it had it be the military. Despite insurection taking place throughout the US by ANTIFA/BLM. It wasn't until the Capitol "breach" that it started gaining the attention of everyone. Mainly due to MSM pushing it to impeach President Trump. This caused a lot of people, fren and normie, to give the Insurection Act another look.

§252. Use of militia and armed forces to enforce Federal authority

Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States, make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, he may call into Federal service such of the militia of any State, and use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress the rebellion.

Did you catch it? "Make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings". You must show that the ordinary course of judicial proceedings is being fully obstructed and impracticable. What happens when every court refuses to hear your case, including SCOTUS?

The Supreme court decision NOT to hear the case opened the door for the President to "call into Federal service such of the militia of any State, and use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress the rebellion."

Q post 461

Jan 04, 2018 What makes a movie GOOD? GREAT ACTORS? Q