StageL3ft 4 points ago +5 / -1

The rabbit hole where all rabbit holes meet. It's crazy how much is seemingly unrelated but comes together to support and explain other events.

StageL3ft 2 points ago +2 / -0

IMO they were all served publically on video.

StageL3ft 10 points ago +10 / -0

The only difference I see here is that the action came after a ruling. Most of them put something out there as if the new norm and push it through the media as such. By the the time SCOTUS calls it unconstitutional, it's too late. It's established norm and hard to reverse. Slow Joe just implied that SCOTUS, the highest court, who's purpose is to keep the Legislative and Executive braches within the Constitution, is somehow irrelevant and will ignore their ruling and take powers into his own hands. POPCORN!!!

StageL3ft 22 points ago +22 / -0

18 U.S.C. 1918 provides penalties for violation of oath office described in 5 U.S.C. 7311 which include: (1) removal from office and; (2) confinement or a fine.

StageL3ft 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes now I also see that Truth Social has refuted the claims and recognize DJT as the Chairman of the Board. https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/truth-social-responds-trump-is-still-chairman/ Honestly I thought of it as another move before his return

StageL3ft 1 point ago +1 / -0

If the point trying to be made was relevant I'd argue they would secure the sight and keep everyone at a safe distance until the slabs can be properly braced with shoring that is commonly available for large poles, beams, concrete slabs, ect. This type of work is done routinely by Crane Operators. After the stones are secure with minimal disturbance the investigators could safely determine the cause. They can take as long as needed. It is public ground and easily patroled. Sorry not trying to be rude about the relevance but really the point is mute. It can be done safely if they wanted too. The question is why did they not want to and who are they?

StageL3ft 7 points ago +7 / -0

Crime scenes don't allow visitors. You would think they would allow a skilled forensic team with experience in demolitions to evaluate prior to completely destroying all evidence. The owner doesn't have a say once the authorities have control of the scene.

StageL3ft 5 points ago +5 / -0

I was thinking this could be possible. It was erected 3/22 (skull and bones) and destroyed on 7/6 which was W's 76th birthday who was part of skull and bones. It fits their typical OCD pattern of numerical perfection. Could be symbolic on the Cabal's part but also could be a huge troll by our military.

view more: Next ›