According to this news story, Jeffrey Epstein is "The Kraken" and is going to spill the beans on Joe and Hunter Biden: https://realrawnews.com/2021/01/epstein-the-kraken-escaped-federal-custody-during-6-jan-riots/
This article claims that Joe Biden has placed a $10,000,000 bounty (Dead or Alive) on Jeffrey "the Kraken" Epstein due to this wildcard in play that will bring down the corrupt government: https://realrawnews.com/2021/01/biden-offers-10000000-bounty-for-jeffery-the-kraken-epstein-dead-or-alive/
Now I have to revisit a question I thought was already solved: Whose voice was it that was overlaid atop Joe Biden's COVID address here? https://youtu.be/hu8IpGiWpso?t=60
For your reference here are interviews to listen to their voices to determine who's:
-
Jeffrey Epstein interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PeGMzQ1bRyo
-
Hunter Biden interview: https://youtu.be/u9AgAx2Adl0?t=356
I think it’s hunter and I compared that voice with another Hunter interview and it sounds just like him but I was told it’s not. But I’m convinced it is.
I have to agree, I still am convinced that the voiceprint matches Hunter, BUT there's a little bit of similarity in their voices if you listen to that the Epstein demon long enough.
I agree, it does sound like Hunter.
Interesting.
Spicy!
Still think it sounds far more like Hunter, though.
I really agree here with you, but I also agree that this is super spicy to consider......
So they were able to successfully fake his suicide in a federal prison, but lost him at the D.C. Capitol while in custody of secret service agents?
Yea right...
Personally I don't buy that they lost him, but it could also explain some delaying.
Thanks for bringing up the examples and making it stupid easy to compare.
If those are my two choices, that is definitely Hunter Biden.
I'm not convinced that the voice is Hunter's though. I'm sure that was a message to the Biden admin though, and if it is Hunter's voice, the Big Guy knows.
I get a good laugh out of people who exclaim, "but, but, but, its Xavier Becerra!!!" ? Oops: https://greatawakening.win/p/11SKGdHrpZ/x/c/4DvnyVGmJaG
Congress are the very people he has dirt on, why would it make sense for him to testify to them?
Testify to a Military Tribunal.
Do we have any reason to believe the Epstein thing besides rumor and the suspicious "death"? Like why do we think he is alive or helping trump? I feel like if he is alive wouldn't he just be hiding out, why do we believe we have him?
The idea is was that got a deal for his slate to be wiped clean and a new identity in return for bringing down the Biden Family Syndicate et al.
The theory makes sense to me, but do we have anything more concrete or any other people that attest to this idea. That makes sense to me but what seems more likely is that they killed him in the absence of other data, I just haven't really seen anything besides online speculation.
Epstein has a slight NY accent. Not him
Very skeptical on this...
I still think it was someone walking by the camera/mic while on the phone. TBH in commercial construction I would have the same dialogue minus the legal issues part but substituted with my massive workload of multiple projects simultaneously being handled. Not everything is a clue to a conspiracy. So if the press conference was on a building fire or collapse /catastrophe , that could’ve been me there and on the phone moving through the conference.
Real Raw News?
Seriously??
And it was Xavier Becerra, the CA AG who was being introduced.
Seriously people. You're making everyone look like fucking nutjobs. This isn't quality research.
You'v'e got to be shitting me. That's 0% possible, have you don't an ear or digital voiceprint on that? LOL
Xavier Becerra interviews:
It's not Hunter or Epstein. It's Becerra. It's not even logical to be Hunter or Epstein. Seriously, it's common sense.
There's absolutely NO way it is Becerra. I posted his interviews earlier. The voice doesn't match whatsoever. Sorry.
Then you're delusional and making everyone else that listens to you look foolish.
It's not even common sense for it to be Hunter Biden or even more insanely - Epstein. They were literally introducing Becerra up next. They were micing him up. He was talking about prosecutions. He's an Attorney General.
I mean whatever dude, you're not going to accept reason. You're stuck on your way of thinking. That's your problem. Confirmation bias is a hell of a drug.
Amazin! I'm stunned by your remarks and frankly your lack of logic. You seem to be entire oblivious to using your senses and deductive reasoning. You're entirely off base here.
Why would it be Epstein?
Or Hunter?
Why would it not be Becerra? Becerra was about to speak and he was being mic'd up. He's a prosecutor. He was informing the press pool about his professional life. One of his last duties as CA AG was to issue a plea deal to someone.
Why would Epstein be talking about his "Life"? Everyone knows about Epstein and his crimes. Wouldn't they be more shocked that he's alive? He wouldn't start off a conversation with "just so you know my life". He's most likely place it like "I know it must be a shock, but I was put in witpro and have since entered a plea deal." or something to that effect. Not "Just so you know my life".
Hunter Biden is hot real estate for news. Wouldn't those listening to Hunter talk about a secretive "plea deal" be in the know? I'm sorry, but the media would leak that. They'd allude to it. They wouldn't need to be "informed". "Just so you know my life" has no linguistic place in such a setting. They know his life. If he WERE to be talking about that, he wouldn't need to pre-face it with "just so you know my life."
However...
"Just so you know my life" absolutely has a place in the setting of a relative no-one AG, from CA being appointed to something by the President. D.C reporters aren't going to know or care about an AG from CA. He's informing them of his professional life "Just so you know my life, I did ____ before I came here".
The most logical explanation is usually the most logical explanation.
The most easy explanation is to use your ears. Becerra simply does not match up whatsoever if you listen to them. It's just not Becerra. Frankly Epstein doesn't match either. It's definitely Hunter, but one can't help but throw out the Epstein thought fo spiciness because of the other information.
I agree. I believe it is California Attorney General Xavier Becerra. Focus on the "uuuh" breaks in his speech pattern. It is unique.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8iP4lkhnKo
https://streamable.com/0bh0zx