Wut dis?
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (22)
sorted by:
Not totally convinced that's real....it contains multiple grammatical errors:
-- "it's" when it should be "its" (twice)
-- "except" when it should be "accept"
Pet peeve of mine, can't help it, it's like fingernails scraping a chalkboard. You'd think a legit legal document, especially one that short, would not contain any such errors.
Considering Clinton’s impeachment hinges on the definition of “is”, I would agree that any spelling error makes a doc of this importance null and void or fake.
There is always one in the group! But in situations like this it is a handy skill to have.
Tried to find original source but all seems locked down / needs an account to access
I see only one possible instance of this, and depending on the legal language, the occurrence of "it's" vs "its" might be correct.
Could be real. Any more of these pop up?