Mate. Not trying to piss in your pool but you're either very misinformed or are a shill.
First off, any of those articles you posted all reference once another and go round and round in a circle - propagation of the same idea is not proof of its existence, this is a common MSM trick. Second of all, that dark photo, for which the articles also draw upon Hilldog as a source (which should make you question it to begin with) has been proven to be manipulated.
Yeah it's not the best source, but it shows people were talking about this back in June. I also watched the livestream the entire week before the inauguration and the lights were off every night.
I also posted a thread where we were talking about it 12 days ago. Which is more than the 10 days people were thinking.
Hey killer. Newsweek is fake news. You didn't know that. Nice try.
https://www.nationalreview.com/news/viral-photo-of-white-house-going-dark-that-was-shared-by-dems-is-from-before-trump-presidency/
Here's another article about it
Mate. Not trying to piss in your pool but you're either very misinformed or are a shill.
First off, any of those articles you posted all reference once another and go round and round in a circle - propagation of the same idea is not proof of its existence, this is a common MSM trick. Second of all, that dark photo, for which the articles also draw upon Hilldog as a source (which should make you question it to begin with) has been proven to be manipulated.
https://www.factcheck.org/2020/06/viral-posts-share-old-edited-white-house-photo-in-dark/
https://news.yahoo.com/viral-photo-white-house-going-161009338.html
Yeah it's not the best source, but it shows people were talking about this back in June. I also watched the livestream the entire week before the inauguration and the lights were off every night.
I also posted a thread where we were talking about it 12 days ago. Which is more than the 10 days people were thinking.