It's not merely my own interpretation, fren. It's a matter of clear and respectful use of the English language.
"[S]ervice was once only a noun, but since the late 19th century it has been used as a transitive verb as well. It may mean 'to provide service for' , 'to pay interest on' , or generally 'to perform services for.' Ordinarily the verb to serve ought to be used in broad senses. Service should be used only if the writer believes that serve would not be suitable in idiom or sense, especially since service also denotes the male animal's function in breeding." (Bryan A. Garner, Garner's Modern American Usage. Oxford University Press, 2003)
That is how you interpret it, anyway.
It's not merely my own interpretation, fren. It's a matter of clear and respectful use of the English language.
(sauce: https://www.thoughtco.com/serve-and-service-1689609)
The issue at hand has to do with servicing things (a car, a computer, etc.) vs. servicing people (or animals).
Just food for thought...