I know nothing about it, I'll take your word for it. Maybe there were several because someone had something they felt was important to say and they kept getting deleted...
You have a fair point about why a person who is intentionally trying to spread disinformation should not be allowed on a platform designed to inform. I am not, and have not been arguing that. What I am arguing is the method of shutting them down. Unless they post something illegal (or they are spamming the same thing) there is no reason to delete what they say. Instead, say why its wrong and let others make up their own mind. That is ALWAYS the way to go.
You have suggested they were spamming the same thing. I don't know what happened. I am suggesting that if I had something that I felt was important to say and it got deleted, I might very well post it again.
When I first encountered the darker parts of Pizzagate (pedovore/adrenochrome) I freaked right the fuck out. I dug deep to find out the veracity of the claims. I found a lot of stuff to verify it. Do I 100% believe everything? Nope. But I can't discount it either. People are waking up all the time. People getting to that point in their exploration of our real history will almost certainly want to discuss it. People getting CENSORED about something they are freaking out about might cause them to try to get their "new truth" out past the censors.
I am not saying this is what happened. I have no idea. I am presenting a plausible explanation in line with "my truth:" that censorship (straight up silencing a person) is never the way.
What flood? What people? Doing a search for "pizzagate" gives me a total of 9 posts over 5 months; most of them pretty well rated.
Are you suggesting that talking about Pizzagate AT ALL is somehow a bad thing?
I know nothing about it, I'll take your word for it. Maybe there were several because someone had something they felt was important to say and they kept getting deleted...
You have a fair point about why a person who is intentionally trying to spread disinformation should not be allowed on a platform designed to inform. I am not, and have not been arguing that. What I am arguing is the method of shutting them down. Unless they post something illegal (or they are spamming the same thing) there is no reason to delete what they say. Instead, say why its wrong and let others make up their own mind. That is ALWAYS the way to go.
You have suggested they were spamming the same thing. I don't know what happened. I am suggesting that if I had something that I felt was important to say and it got deleted, I might very well post it again.
When I first encountered the darker parts of Pizzagate (pedovore/adrenochrome) I freaked right the fuck out. I dug deep to find out the veracity of the claims. I found a lot of stuff to verify it. Do I 100% believe everything? Nope. But I can't discount it either. People are waking up all the time. People getting to that point in their exploration of our real history will almost certainly want to discuss it. People getting CENSORED about something they are freaking out about might cause them to try to get their "new truth" out past the censors.
I am not saying this is what happened. I have no idea. I am presenting a plausible explanation in line with "my truth:" that censorship (straight up silencing a person) is never the way.