"That Simon guy" is not Q nor is he a part of Q nor does he have any "insider knowledge" to the plan or anything, he's been using it to make money and a name for himself and in no way represents this movement.
The credible intel and information we've gotten from the leads in the drops still hold true.
Nothing has changed the credibility of the actual intel, only certain "anons"/content creators lose credibility when they espouse things such as "insider knowledge" or make definitive claims from date-fagging and other things which could lead one to lose credibility within this movement.
Nothing about the actual movement has been debunked, hell, most of it's never even actually been discussed because they simply make shit up about Q and the anons (or to them, Qanon) and use those strawmen to then "deboonk" it as a whole in order to get normies to just dismiss it.
Really though they just make people aware of it and some of them come to actually check it out for themselves, and then once it's a matter of taking the information one is getting from this movement and comparing it with that of the information from MSM, it's not difficult from there to determine which source actually lines up with and makes sense of reality as we know it.
You're welcome. Your question and concern doesn't ring as "shill," so just ignore the hostilities that come from some, people are on edge and we're constantly bombarded by shills and demoralizers and all the things we don't need on the frontlines of this information war.
Honest questions and the interest to learn these things are what we DO need, so thank YOU for taking the time and consideration to ask these questions and seek the truth. Keep at it, this place is an excellent source of info and other sources, just make sure to use discernment throughout.
"That Simon guy" is not Q nor is he a part of Q nor does he have any "insider knowledge" to the plan or anything, he's been using it to make money and a name for himself and in no way represents this movement.
The credible intel and information we've gotten from the leads in the drops still hold true.
Nothing has changed the credibility of the actual intel, only certain "anons"/content creators lose credibility when they espouse things such as "insider knowledge" or make definitive claims from date-fagging and other things which could lead one to lose credibility within this movement.
Nothing about the actual movement has been debunked, hell, most of it's never even actually been discussed because they simply make shit up about Q and the anons (or to them, Qanon) and use those strawmen to then "deboonk" it as a whole in order to get normies to just dismiss it.
Really though they just make people aware of it and some of them come to actually check it out for themselves, and then once it's a matter of taking the information one is getting from this movement and comparing it with that of the information from MSM, it's not difficult from there to determine which source actually lines up with and makes sense of reality as we know it.
You're welcome. Your question and concern doesn't ring as "shill," so just ignore the hostilities that come from some, people are on edge and we're constantly bombarded by shills and demoralizers and all the things we don't need on the frontlines of this information war.
Honest questions and the interest to learn these things are what we DO need, so thank YOU for taking the time and consideration to ask these questions and seek the truth. Keep at it, this place is an excellent source of info and other sources, just make sure to use discernment throughout.
Did you know General Flynn commissioned a painting for Simon? Are you right 100% of the time? Think for yourself.
Simon? lol, what are you?
Low effort shill on a sleeper account. Yawn. Deport.