I agree. Flynn may or may not be on our side, but nothing in this collection of comments does anything to prove that one way or another. Just seems like some anti-Flynn shilling.
many of us have followed Flynn since Obama fired him (about the time of Sy Hersh's disclosures on Generals working behind the scenes with Russia to avoid WWWIII in Syria after Obama's "red line in the sand.") before Trump secured the nomination, 2014-2015, Flynn interviews could be seen - by today's perspective - as "pre Q." the reason I say that is Flynn was dropping clues about what rabbit holes to dive into.
7-8 years of Flynn demonstrates he is CLEARLY on our side. you should account for that before making flippant comments to sow seeds of doubt among the new or unsuspecting.
7-8 years of Flynn demonstrates he is CLEARLY on our side. you should account for that before making flippant comments to sow seeds of doubt among the new or unsuspecting.
What the fuck are you babbling about? I literally said "one way OR THE OTHER". That's called neutrality. I was also the one who began defending Flynn by pointing out he turned on Obama.
There is a moron at my work who started spouting off hella ridiculous shit...[he said that Flynn took the fall for Trump working with Russians] I was like.....can you do that, and he said. ya. why do you think he got impeached. I was like. Oh. I don't really follow politics. Then I went and wept for him in silence.
Look I admit it is difficult to determine who is on our side however...
General Flynn didn't work happily for Obama. In fact he turned on Obama which is why he was in this mess to begin with.
Too many people making too many conclusions with zero actual facts.
I agree. Flynn may or may not be on our side, but nothing in this collection of comments does anything to prove that one way or another. Just seems like some anti-Flynn shilling.
"not in this collection of comments" - correct.
many of us have followed Flynn since Obama fired him (about the time of Sy Hersh's disclosures on Generals working behind the scenes with Russia to avoid WWWIII in Syria after Obama's "red line in the sand.") before Trump secured the nomination, 2014-2015, Flynn interviews could be seen - by today's perspective - as "pre Q." the reason I say that is Flynn was dropping clues about what rabbit holes to dive into.
7-8 years of Flynn demonstrates he is CLEARLY on our side. you should account for that before making flippant comments to sow seeds of doubt among the new or unsuspecting.
What the fuck are you babbling about? I literally said "one way OR THE OTHER". That's called neutrality. I was also the one who began defending Flynn by pointing out he turned on Obama.
Focus your energy where it needs to be.
Flynn could have been hoodwinked by false sources too while trying to do the right thing. Remember that letter Lin Wood posted the other day?
A lot of generalities, some blatantly false, with no specifics about anything.
I doubt any of these people are real people. Most normies have no clue who Flynn is.
We call those users CCP paid military intelligence officers...they have 140,000 who just make posts to fuel their narrative...
Light mode...ahhh my eyes...
I can see why leftists would hate our next President just as much as they hate our current one
There is a moron at my work who started spouting off hella ridiculous shit...[he said that Flynn took the fall for Trump working with Russians] I was like.....can you do that, and he said. ya. why do you think he got impeached. I was like. Oh. I don't really follow politics. Then I went and wept for him in silence.