James Wood reply to AOC
(media.gab.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (74)
sorted by:
Awesome. Thanks for that table! I also note that water vapor is 1.93, which is more than double that of CO2. So more CO2 really has a cooling effect, whereas it is more water vapor that actually has a potential heating effect, which is why it feels warmer when it is overcast. Correct?
The truth of the matter is that water is the global phase-change refrigerant, and is the driver of all these storms.
It is true that water holds more energy.
However, there's something about this calculating heating or cooling.
This is all farce.
There is no such thing as any cold, light blocking component,
of any cold, light blocking, oxygen enriched, Nitrogen atmospheric bath,
that makes the cold Nitrogen bath a heater.
No cold, light blocking, oxygen-enriched
Nitrogen atmospheric bath,
is a heater.
Ever.
The atmosphere is a cold, light blocking, Nitrogen bath,
laced with cold, light blocking Oxygen,
and with cold, light blocking Green House Gases, the main one of which is the globe's cold, light blocking, phase-change refrigerant, water.
The green house gases do not warm this planet. Any. Ever.
If god came into your room in that beam of light thing, and awakened you and told you ''signtsie fellurs dun two have sed them cold nitrogen baths, is done come heaters frum fire sin, so it's real!''
He's drunk. And he doesn't know wtF he's saying.
No cold Nitrogen bath is ever a heater. No cold light blocking oxygen added to it makes it a heater, No cold light blocking green house gas refrigerants make it a heater.
The Atmosphere is a cold, light blocking, oxygen enriched, Nitrogen bath.
Full stop. No Negotiations, no maybe sometimes when it's dark outside,
no maybe on Thursdays,
no maybe when the Chairman jiggles the Yuan a little, so Hunter can pick up that sexy little property down by the Harbor at a steep discount.
No cold, light blocking component, of any cold, light blocking Nitrogen bath, has made that cold, light blocking bath, to have done come a heater from fire sin.
Cold, light blocking components, of cold, light blocking baths, can not heat the objects, they make less light get to, and go into.
Making less light go into a rock, through immersing it in a cold, light blocking bath, can not ever make instruments on the rock detect and depict, more light being in the rock, to come back out, every time the cold light blocking bath, makes less go into it, because of how less goes into it.
Every last symbol of every last syllable of every last sentence, of every last statement,
about ''Cold Nitrogen baths are heaters now because you used some fire, and made fire sin'' is a transparently ridiculous lie.
It's just that simple
PeaceCrew the methods you have been exposed to and had explained to you as able to be used to calculate temperatures of objects immersed in cold Nitrogen baths, are wrong.
And have ZERO to do with any temperature
of any light warmed object,
immersed in any cold, light blocking, oxygen enriched,
greenhouse gas-refrigerants laced,
Nitrogen bath.
Stefan Boltzmann is NEVER used, e v e r.
NOT
ONCE
in actually calculating the temperature of any object
immersed in any cold bath.
NEVER.
This cannot be stressed enough to you.
Stefan-Boltzmann is NOT one of the GAS laws.
Temperatures of things immersed in cold gas baths, calculated using Stefan-Boltzmann, will ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS derive an erroneous value.
The method Stefan Boltzmann uses, does NOT work, on gases.
Gases are the compressible fluids
phase of matter.
It's why they have their OWN LAWS and Stefan-Boltzmann
isn't
one of them. EVER.
PeaceCrew Soz for the mean seeming hardline rhetoric it's part of being rhetorically oriented when talking about highly charged subjects, like the complete overthrow of all educational standards, teaching children that cold Nitrogen baths have become heaters because they used fire.