Are shut off every evening 11 pm. I verified this myself when I went to DC for the stop the steal march on Jan 6th. I walked almost 2 miles on the evening of the 5th just to see the White House, and I was very disappointed to realize the.lights were shut off all except for the flag. The same as they have been in the "10 days of darkness". I asked a SS agent why and he told me they are shut off at 11 every night. That was 15 days before Trump left office. You can verify this for yourself by watching the earthcam stream at about 10:58 pm EDT. The lights will be on up untill 11 pm. It is a residence; not a tourist attraction, and it doesnt need to be lit at all times, so it isn't. You can also make a phone call, it is pretty simple to verify this for yourself, and please do. DO NOT TAKE MY WORD FOR IT!!! This is a Q forum and people still arent doing the work to verify info before they spread it. Please do your due dilligence. The White House lights are not a secret signal, and I am sick of telling people that. Rant over Edit: I spoke to a uniformed USSS officer, not an agent. Link in commemts for details.
The White House lights
BREAKING NEWS
Indid not speak to anything I cannot verify personally. There are anomalies, no doubt. But as for the exterior lights of the White House. They are shut off at 11pm. When the flag light goes out, let me know. That'll be an anomaly. Either way shit shouldnt be so encrypted at this point in my opinion. We need to stop clutching at normal occurences and trying to decipher them.
I don't take much of a side on this issue, but let's get a bit of real context to what the debate is and not try and smear it with red herrings.
The claim is not that lights are regularly turned off at a set time, it's the amount of lights that's at issue. Yes most residents have a set schedule when lights around the house will go off. But when your porch light and security lights start also going off every night, it might be significant.
Also your secret service LARP calls into question your true motives here with me. I'm pretty sure SS are still staunch professionals who don't take time to have have random conversations while on the job. Could be that you were fooled into thinking some grounds security was SS, either way it has me question it regardless.
My guy, they are secret service, not the buckingham palace guard. Its not againat protocol to answer a question for someone.
Ok if you say so. ?
But yeah it absolutely is.
thank you OP for pointing this out. I figured this should be easy enough to verify and guess what? It was! I'll be putting together a post to show the evidence that this has indeed been the case for many years. So tired of our side not verifying facts before passing them along.
Right? Verifying facts doesn't always go with your cognitive bias, but even when you disprove something you usually find something else in the dig.
Some real solid evidence you've got there...
You can verify for yourself, as I said. Its not hard
Irrelevant. Who did you speak to? what is their position? how do I know that conversation even happened? what if the sources you suggest to contact are compromised? What if theyre misinformed? what if some lights get turned off but others normally stay on? What if those lights that normally stay on were off for the 10 days Did you specify which of the lights were turned off when you were asking the SS?
I'm not saying you're wrong or right. And being in England I'm not able to easily verify information, nor do I want to. But you're here trying to convince people who are super skeptical of any information with no direct source of information. Why not email the people you feel have the answer and post their answer on here?
Lol why not verify for yourself like Q tells you to. Why believe an email over my statement? I have given you resources to verify for yourself remotely. Go do so. Stop wasting your time queationing anything if you don't question everything
I wish I could updoot this 1,000 times! I have to admit, the amount of disinformation that flows from this board makes me really struggle to "trust the plan" overall. I'm sure I'm not alone.
So because people on the outside are doing their best to figure out what's what and often get it wrong you struggle with trusting the plan?
Yeah. That makes sense
It used to be lit up all night....til the put in the minefield!
They have the best thermal and night imaging in the world and geosynchronous satellites watching that bitch that could pick up an ingrown hair from orbit. Darkness is an advantage to them, I promise.
It's not just a personal residence though, it's a federal bdlg. And it houses the POTUS so it would seem security would be high 24/7, both inside and out, no? Are we to believe inside security roams around in the dark?
Also why is POTUS and family forced to go to bed at 11 every night so they can turn off all the lights exactly at 11? That's a serious question and one I've never gotten someone who insists "lights out at 11" to answer.
Who says the president has to be in bed at 11 for the exterior lights to be turned off? The interior lights have never gone dark, just like the flag has never gone dark. Prove me wrong. Also; dark is an advantage to a security force that has the best of the best thermal and night vision accoutrements. It also makes it so if you want to assault The White House, you will need the same accoutrements. Camoflage is easy, hiding a heat signature is not
Our White House camera gets an upgrade, meanwhile please enjoy our Capitol camera view
Secret Sevice, dipshit. You obviosly didn't read the whole post or any of the comments
block those people. stop clogging us with these posts.
May I ask why we must block someone who may have done some research and may be providing us truth. For example, I'm doing research on "ha" in Trump's response to the articles of impeachment. X22 report has the "ha" highlighted in the word "that." I'm trying to see if the actual document had it highlighted or if this is just false hopium. I'm not trying to discredit anyone. I'm looking for the truth. You cannot find the truth if you discount everyone who is looking? Are you? Or are you taking everything at face value. That, to me, means that maybe you should be blocked or at least returned to Twitter where no one knows anything except what they are told.
Excellent
do what you want to do. that's it. if you don't like someone, block them. that's what we tell everyone else to do. follow your own advice. start with me, if you want. just block me.
It's not that I don't like you. I don't know you. I'm speaking in respect to the fact that when faced with an idea you do not like, you discount the person with that idea or that research. That is very dangerous. It is sometimes referred to as the blind-leading-the-blind. An example I can give is as author and an editor, I've seen authors who never, and I mean never use "passive" forms of verbs or even the word "that." When challenged, they have no idea why they do it. They've just been told not to use those words or forms of words. When you explain the exact rule to them and have them read a sentence that definitely requires a passive form or the word 'that," they sometimes wake up and realize the rules have specific purposes and should be used in those instances. Others will continue to tell me I'm wrong. I edit and I write for a living. I'm a word geek. That's the best (and probably lamest example I can give you for how misinformation works). I argue with authors with whom I edit for a publisher on a daily basis about these rules. They will stand beside their misconceptions because a critique partner (not an industry professional, but someone learning just as they are learning) to their own detriment, and I have to ask before I make the correction and discount their argument, "Do you think I'm telling you a lie to ruin your career and make the publisher look unprofessional? No. I'm trying to keep you from looking like an uneducated author and to keep our company viable in the industry. Misinformation taken as fact without regard from where it come can make someone look unknowledgeable and it can make a system appear unprofessional or, for lack of a better word, like a bunch of lunatics--which is how they wish to see us anyway. We're handing them ammunition. The person who posted gave us information he/she said they researched--personally. If true, then the cancellation of a lie can keep us all from looking stupid, but I suggest we also do was that person asked. Look for ourselves. He or she didn't ask someone who knew someone who knew someone's grandmother and tell you to take their word for it. They did their own research and asked you to follow up with your own. I prefer to regard someone who does that than to take someone at their word. We are asked to question everything. So why would someone questioning something and trying to find an answer mean they need to be deported from a group who is supposedly seeking answers?
I'll tell you what they tell people on 4chan. lurk moar. read more. see how the board works and see how people interact. getting mad at mods doesn't do anything but waste time, especially when you have the ability to block and deport people. learn all you can. try not to be too condescending about things (myself included). learn to discern the difference between time wasting trolls and people actually curious. if you ask a question that can be simply answered by looking through even just the top posts of hot, don't expect too much from people. in the way of help. if you're not a troll, I apologize.
No, he talked to a USSS Uniformed Police Officer. He doesn't know the difference.
Lol ss is ss to me. Maybe some are deputized, but for sure his battle rattle said secret service in plain english. Just because when you think ss you picture a suit and dark glasses doeant mean there is a difference between one in a uniform and une in a suit. Prove me wrong.
One is agent, the other is an officer. One is in uniform, the other is not.
https://theweek.com/articles/443399/what-uniformed-division-secret-service-anyway
"They regularly interact with the public, something most special agents don't do."
FWIW - I'm a stickler for details. I've lived in DC for decades. I can be at 1600 in 25 minutes. That said, I'm awaiting a F2F with a USSS officer friend to ask him about the lights out. I'm not disagreeing with you, Fren. Just need some clarity.
I stand corrected! Thank you for the info, and thank you for questioning what I posted for yourself. I will edit the post for clarity Please do meet f2f with a USSS officer yourself and post when you verify yourself. Thanks, fren!
My pleasure. I wasn't trying to be a dick, just trying to keep things as factual as possible. I've lived in DC most of my life. Almost all my friends are MIL/IC/LE/FEDLE/GOV - I'm in that mix too. It was the same when people were trying to make a big deal out of the weather on inauguration. No one wanted to believe me that we had an unpredicted snow flurry storm that day, but we did. Also a lot of wind. The devil's in the details. WWG1WGA.
What did you find out?
He's TDY at them moment. I won't get it from the horse's mouth until next week.
Let us know my friend!
You are 25 min away from the WH. Just go there tonight at 11 and watch them shut off for yourself. There will be other officers there too, ask them.
I'll take a pass. I only travel armed and not doing that in DC now. Besides, I'm sleeping at 1100 ; )
Why are they on till 11 every night then?
Facts dont care about your feelings
Yes. They are in fact people, and wouldnt you kmow it, they know english!! Lol. Go to the white house man, they have SS all around that bitch. You can talk to one too lol
What did my post suggest you do? Trust me, or verify for yourself. Sorry to slap the hopium out your grill
I spoke to a "Uniformed USSS Officer" and yes. They are posted all over the WH and will talk to people
Good question, or did the OP mean uniformed SS that do the typical guard duty type stuff and look like cops?
You can. This is easily verifiable information. Im sure there is an archive of earthcam footage for the WH. IDK how you verify it to your satisfaction, all I know is what I saw with my own 2 eyes and you shouldnt take my word that I saw it.