I will have to respectfully disagree. There are specific patents and instruction manual of best practices for these things already. Doesn't matter what name you use but people are definelty spraying chemicals into the air with intent to cause changes.
I'm not saying that the concept of "spraying substances in the sky" is stupid. I'm saying that when chemtards see an aircraft flying across the sky, they point to the contrail and claim that as evidence that they are spraying us.
I am a pilot and student of history and science, i can tell the difference between the two. Can you? The first step towards the truth is just noticing they are different. We can argue about why, if you like, but I see two different kinds of trails in the sky.
I have noticed that telling does not help when it comes to Q or things that bring cognitive dissonance. There have been new kinds of clouds ""discovered" during the last 30 years, start looking there. In the spirit of things, though, among the first formations I started to notice look like long white contrails that span the sky and seem to develop little caterpillar legs as they spread into a haze.
https://static01.nyt.com/images/2016/08/16/science/16CHEMTRAILS/16CHEMTRAILS-superJumbo.jpg
Edit to add that I wanted to put a picture of an actual contrail here but it is surprisingly or perhaps not surprisingly hard to find one. If anyone can post a picture for Catsfive of an actual short lived contrail I would appreciate it, I am about to go afk. Thanks!
I will have to respectfully disagree. There are specific patents and instruction manual of best practices for these things already. Doesn't matter what name you use but people are definelty spraying chemicals into the air with intent to cause changes.
There are patents and manuals for nuclear weapons... doesnt mean that they are constantly setting off nukes....
I'm not saying that the concept of "spraying substances in the sky" is stupid. I'm saying that when chemtards see an aircraft flying across the sky, they point to the contrail and claim that as evidence that they are spraying us.
Yeah, NO.
Strawman fail. Give it up, you are either too dumb or lazy to study the mountains of sources or you knowingly argue in bad faith.
Strawman? You don't know what that is, apparently.
No, that's a strawman. Also moving the goal posts.
I am a pilot and student of history and science, i can tell the difference between the two. Can you? The first step towards the truth is just noticing they are different. We can argue about why, if you like, but I see two different kinds of trails in the sky.
Tell me the characteristics.
I have noticed that telling does not help when it comes to Q or things that bring cognitive dissonance. There have been new kinds of clouds ""discovered" during the last 30 years, start looking there. In the spirit of things, though, among the first formations I started to notice look like long white contrails that span the sky and seem to develop little caterpillar legs as they spread into a haze. https://static01.nyt.com/images/2016/08/16/science/16CHEMTRAILS/16CHEMTRAILS-superJumbo.jpg
Edit to add that I wanted to put a picture of an actual contrail here but it is surprisingly or perhaps not surprisingly hard to find one. If anyone can post a picture for Catsfive of an actual short lived contrail I would appreciate it, I am about to go afk. Thanks!
Why make this thread? Just lock the off-topic threads and keep it clean. This just feeds into the distraction. This thread is 100% hot air.
Because over the past week, I'm seeing chemtrails mentioned in comment streams all over this .WIN, and I want to know why.
Well now, you are why
This isn't going away lol
I see your point. Maybe using some truth so they can throw it all out. I understand.