^ THIS ^ is what I mean by mental retardation. So, all contrails disappear, but if they have the chemicals being sprayed, they persist? You're saying that contrails always disappear, unless they have chemtrail chemicals in them?
Ludicrous.
What's doing the spraying in your theory, the engine? Or secondary systems unrelated to the engine, but on each aircraft, designed to look like it's coming from the engine, i.e., four trails from a 747/380, two from, say, a 737?
I have personally taken apart a 737 engine. Nothing spraying in there. At all.
I have personally taken apart a 737 wing. Nothing spraying in there, either.
And yeah, no, tons of those WW2 bomber contrail photos show the contrails persisting. What, are you blind? Or just actually mentally retarded?
Chem trails are real.
Quit tying to equate water vapor contrails that disappear in minutes to chem trails that last all day and disperse much slower.
Your ww2 Google search of bombers contrails is an absolute joke. you seem really butt hurt and scared trying to constantly sticky your comments.
^ THIS ^ is what I mean by mental retardation. So, all contrails disappear, but if they have the chemicals being sprayed, they persist? You're saying that contrails always disappear, unless they have chemtrail chemicals in them? Ludicrous. What's doing the spraying in your theory, the engine? Or secondary systems unrelated to the engine, but on each aircraft, designed to look like it's coming from the engine, i.e., four trails from a 747/380, two from, say, a 737? I have personally taken apart a 737 engine. Nothing spraying in there. At all. I have personally taken apart a 737 wing. Nothing spraying in there, either. And yeah, no, tons of those WW2 bomber contrail photos show the contrails persisting. What, are you blind? Or just actually mentally retarded?
LOL—this is where each of you losers bail.