https://qanon.pub/?q=Qanon#4881
There is 'Q'. 1
There are 'Anons'. 2
There is no 'Qanon'. 3
Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?
DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].
You are correct, CJ.
Retweet @ 17:17 had meaning. [mathematical probability _17:17 [day after]?]
Do you believe it was a coincidence surgical removal of You Tube accounts occurred same day as 'Hunter' drop?
Welcome to the Digital Battlefield.
Q
He seems to get good intel, but people who monetize always make me a little suspicious. That he is even able to get sponsors in this climate is a little irksome to me.
I'd look to him for a hit of good news and happenings, but don't rely on him solely.
I understand... but with the mass DEMONITIZATION.. I cant fault him for doing that... you cant do this stuff for free(?)