Hmmm ? I wonder if the tech platforms are trying to prep the masses for an upcoming narrative?
(media.greatawakening.win)
?? Theory ??
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (39)
sorted by:
The problem with their Deep Fake narrative is what the content of the videos themselves contain.
If their are videos of some very disturbing actions, no one is going to see them as deep fakes.
Furthermore, these deep fakes are limited in that they handle straight one facial features and are still not perfect. Refer to the recent finale of the Mandalorian with the Luke Skywalker facial reveal to understand.
It depends. That was a Hollywood attempt at deepfaking. Hollywood has not caught up to the best YouTuber deepfake artists yet in terms of deepfake quality. Even some Hollywood full CGI facial models with a ton of work put into them come up short compared to the best amateur deepfakes.
For example, here's the YouTuber Shamook's deepfake replacement of the fake-looking CGI Grand Moff Tarkin in "Rogue One":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_CXMb_MO3aw
It looks uncannily real, unlike the Hollywood CGI attempt.
And here's Shamook's deepfake of Harrison Ford in "Solo: A Star Wars Story":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bC3uH4Xw4Xo
It's not perfect, but it's far more expressive than Disney's CGI Luke.
You last line says it all, "It's not perfect," and that was my point. In other words, you can still spot a deep fake even with today's tech.
In addition, like I said, it will also depend on the content. If there emerge videos of crimes with children, no one is going to believe someone would put something with that content together just to add a deep fake face.