On Jan 20th only 1 hour after JB was ingratiated the WHO said that they shouldn't use such a high cycle count (35-40 cycles) and reduced it to 21 cycles. Huge difference and we can see it in the numbers immediately.
My point is that the meme does not say that. I assumed you created the meme. If so, adding that would be the red pill.
BTW, do you have a link to the 21 cycles. I haven't seen anything specifically about 21 cycles, but I could have missed it. Not seeing anything with a quick search online. At 21 cycles, there should be almost nobody with a "positive" test result.
Many of us (maybe you, too) predicted this would happen months ago.
I believe the "positive" range that is in consideration now is anything up to a Ct of 33. 21 is absurdly low, especially for RNA fairly crudely extracted from saliva/phlegm. A difference in Ct value of 1 is equivalent to a difference in expression of 10^1, and so on. So considering a Ct value of 21 to be the upper threshold rather than 30-33 is saying the body must have 10^9 - 10^12 additional copies of viral RNA present, which is a massive difference.
And sorry I don't have a source on that, I just do a lot of PCR.
You need to add info about the PCR cycle change that coincides with this graph. Then, you would have something.
On Jan 20th only 1 hour after JB was ingratiated the WHO said that they shouldn't use such a high cycle count (35-40 cycles) and reduced it to 21 cycles. Huge difference and we can see it in the numbers immediately.
My point is that the meme does not say that. I assumed you created the meme. If so, adding that would be the red pill.
BTW, do you have a link to the 21 cycles. I haven't seen anything specifically about 21 cycles, but I could have missed it. Not seeing anything with a quick search online. At 21 cycles, there should be almost nobody with a "positive" test result.
Many of us (maybe you, too) predicted this would happen months ago.
I believe the "positive" range that is in consideration now is anything up to a Ct of 33. 21 is absurdly low, especially for RNA fairly crudely extracted from saliva/phlegm. A difference in Ct value of 1 is equivalent to a difference in expression of 10^1, and so on. So considering a Ct value of 21 to be the upper threshold rather than 30-33 is saying the body must have 10^9 - 10^12 additional copies of viral RNA present, which is a massive difference.
And sorry I don't have a source on that, I just do a lot of PCR.