Heh, used to read Bill Moyer's interviews a life time ago. Figures it was about overpopulation. That's been a long running thing -- finding other human life to be a burden. From today's Bill Gates vaccine, and back to Pharaoh throwing baby boys into the river.
And I suppose... the motivation for it ... that G-d's followers have the commandment to go forth and multiply. (A G-d that loves us so much his first commandment is to have lots of sex. Heh). Versus... I suppose your viewpoint is that Satan hates humanity and therefore wants it limited or exterminated. Probably justified by whatever is handy at the time. (Overpopulation, too much resources, whatever).
The rewards and penalties for Mitzvahs versus Averroes (sins) are pretty well documented. My greatest blessings -- my children -- would not have been available to me if I continued to pursue the sin I mentioned early of crossdressing. Well, dressing itself made it less likely but still possible. Transitioning sterilizes the person, which makes offspring impossible -- and I imagine that's one reason your organization would favor it. Convince more teens to transition = less people, once they sterilize themselves via surgery and hormones. Their happiness and well-being ... not considerations.
all correct. there is tonnes of pros for it. transgenders also hate themselves, are more likely to commit suicide and rarely believe in god. It creates an issue to bash the you guys with for 'being wrong', and provides more sex workers for our enjoyment=more sin, etc. Oh, and witches - many witches (usually not affiliated with bloodlines, but nice to have) are transgendered too.
they're also used in education now to indoctrinate kids via new age. that netflix show ru pauls drag race makes it all look so glamourous.
I could type for 10 minutes about all the benefits of just this one thing, there are so many things that work against you that it's hard to even remember them all Lol
Guess it does work as a good card in your hand. And the glamor thing you mention -- what a symbol! Brings misery, infertility, suicide, being turned into a commodity for sex... but at least you get to wear the glamorous, shiny dress! What a bargain....
Gay marriage for the same reasons? I was wondering how it got pushed through the courts with maddening speed. But I guess you'd have the same motivations: Infertile relationship, leading to less offspring. Another opportunity to bash the Christians. And more ways to advertise to children.
yup. there are monogamous and non-evil gays, but it's useful for the same reasons as the transgenders - and to discredit judaism and christianity.
In Leviticus, it is written that sodomites go to hell. consider that monogamous gays didn't exist - they were all sex fiends and/or cheating on spouses - so that verse is right for the cultural context.
infiltrate the churches and synagogues - 'that applies to sodomites today, and means gays are evil', >> society sees the hypocrisy and flawed theology for what it is. gays have always had it worse than non-gays in society, they're probably a fuck up either of your gods work or evolution (done by lucifer or mutation).
Denying christians the compassion to understand and help them is a boon, gays would be some of the most righteous and holy otherwise - instead they rebel against christianity and are purposefully sinful.
Actually, no -- Leviticus condemns the action of male homosexual behavior. A homosexual, if by that definition you mean someone with the inclination -- is only sinning if he acts on that urge. The idea that someone is randomly and permanently committed to one brand of sexual preference is actually a very recent one. (And probably not even true; I think the mythology has been useful to the LGBT lobby politically, especially to piggy back on the civil rights won by blacks. It benefited LGBT activists to pretend sexuality is as inborn and unalterable as skin color. Truth takes a back seat).
As for "worse" in society... well, by your values, gays would have it better, wouldn't they? Think of the perks: Unlimited sex without a reproductive capacity. The joy of orgasm, more readily given because men do not fear getting pregnant, so they don't have the motivation to not engage that women always had. (Who wants to get impregnated from a one night stand?). Also, men engaged exclusively in homosexuality generally don't have offspring, another victory for the anti-human ideals of your philosophy.
After all, what does the heterosexual couple get? Well, children. They stress, the heartache, the financial commitment, the sleepless nights. Wouldn't Satanism prefer to forgo that and live for the orgasms available at any night club?
Makes me wonder why anyone with that ideology would want to have children. Though it sounded, in your case, your father did it as a sort of status symbol. Is that accurate?
Heh, used to read Bill Moyer's interviews a life time ago. Figures it was about overpopulation. That's been a long running thing -- finding other human life to be a burden. From today's Bill Gates vaccine, and back to Pharaoh throwing baby boys into the river.
And I suppose... the motivation for it ... that G-d's followers have the commandment to go forth and multiply. (A G-d that loves us so much his first commandment is to have lots of sex. Heh). Versus... I suppose your viewpoint is that Satan hates humanity and therefore wants it limited or exterminated. Probably justified by whatever is handy at the time. (Overpopulation, too much resources, whatever).
The rewards and penalties for Mitzvahs versus Averroes (sins) are pretty well documented. My greatest blessings -- my children -- would not have been available to me if I continued to pursue the sin I mentioned early of crossdressing. Well, dressing itself made it less likely but still possible. Transitioning sterilizes the person, which makes offspring impossible -- and I imagine that's one reason your organization would favor it. Convince more teens to transition = less people, once they sterilize themselves via surgery and hormones. Their happiness and well-being ... not considerations.
Correct summation?
all correct. there is tonnes of pros for it. transgenders also hate themselves, are more likely to commit suicide and rarely believe in god. It creates an issue to bash the you guys with for 'being wrong', and provides more sex workers for our enjoyment=more sin, etc. Oh, and witches - many witches (usually not affiliated with bloodlines, but nice to have) are transgendered too.
they're also used in education now to indoctrinate kids via new age. that netflix show ru pauls drag race makes it all look so glamourous.
I could type for 10 minutes about all the benefits of just this one thing, there are so many things that work against you that it's hard to even remember them all Lol
Guess it does work as a good card in your hand. And the glamor thing you mention -- what a symbol! Brings misery, infertility, suicide, being turned into a commodity for sex... but at least you get to wear the glamorous, shiny dress! What a bargain....
Gay marriage for the same reasons? I was wondering how it got pushed through the courts with maddening speed. But I guess you'd have the same motivations: Infertile relationship, leading to less offspring. Another opportunity to bash the Christians. And more ways to advertise to children.
yup. there are monogamous and non-evil gays, but it's useful for the same reasons as the transgenders - and to discredit judaism and christianity.
In Leviticus, it is written that sodomites go to hell. consider that monogamous gays didn't exist - they were all sex fiends and/or cheating on spouses - so that verse is right for the cultural context.
infiltrate the churches and synagogues - 'that applies to sodomites today, and means gays are evil', >> society sees the hypocrisy and flawed theology for what it is. gays have always had it worse than non-gays in society, they're probably a fuck up either of your gods work or evolution (done by lucifer or mutation).
Denying christians the compassion to understand and help them is a boon, gays would be some of the most righteous and holy otherwise - instead they rebel against christianity and are purposefully sinful.
Actually, no -- Leviticus condemns the action of male homosexual behavior. A homosexual, if by that definition you mean someone with the inclination -- is only sinning if he acts on that urge. The idea that someone is randomly and permanently committed to one brand of sexual preference is actually a very recent one. (And probably not even true; I think the mythology has been useful to the LGBT lobby politically, especially to piggy back on the civil rights won by blacks. It benefited LGBT activists to pretend sexuality is as inborn and unalterable as skin color. Truth takes a back seat).
As for "worse" in society... well, by your values, gays would have it better, wouldn't they? Think of the perks: Unlimited sex without a reproductive capacity. The joy of orgasm, more readily given because men do not fear getting pregnant, so they don't have the motivation to not engage that women always had. (Who wants to get impregnated from a one night stand?). Also, men engaged exclusively in homosexuality generally don't have offspring, another victory for the anti-human ideals of your philosophy.
After all, what does the heterosexual couple get? Well, children. They stress, the heartache, the financial commitment, the sleepless nights. Wouldn't Satanism prefer to forgo that and live for the orgasms available at any night club?
Makes me wonder why anyone with that ideology would want to have children. Though it sounded, in your case, your father did it as a sort of status symbol. Is that accurate?