I’m not what all the fuss is about whether people say Q or Qanon or anons? It’s a straightforward shorthand. It may well be used mostly by people who haven’t sufficiently delved into Q but it’s just a name. Everyone understands more or less who they are talking about..
Sure, but that’s simply not how language works. Widespread usage becomes ‘correct’ by definition, provided it’s widely understood. Obviously for us we can see who’s who by the specific nuances of how people refer to Q
In this case, we need to make the distinction. What you're talking about is public perception based on MSM lies and deceit. Doesn't make it right, nor is it correct and truthful. So, its time to make the distinction public. The truth isn't some grey area to be manipulated. That's [their] game, and if you continue playing that game [their] way, you lose everytime because [they] like to control the public's perception, JUST LIKE the [MSM] is doin with Q.
"There is Q. There are Anons. There is NO "QAnon." Point blank. End of discussion.
Don't fall for that trap any more. Quit using the term "QAnon."
There's loads of us all over social media who have made that distinction very clear. It's time it starts going viral.
No. I’m saying that all language works the way it does and always has done regardless of anyone’s proscriptive wishes. That includes Q, the MSM, you, me and anyone else.
As near as I can tell, “Qanon” represents the disinformation shills who troll forums where people who discuss Q are posting.
It’s also handy for the lamestream media since it’s easier to serve up search engine fake news results on “Qanon” instead of “Q”
It shows clearly that they do not know. Or care to learn any of the nuances
I’m not what all the fuss is about whether people say Q or Qanon or anons? It’s a straightforward shorthand. It may well be used mostly by people who haven’t sufficiently delved into Q but it’s just a name. Everyone understands more or less who they are talking about..
Sure, but that’s simply not how language works. Widespread usage becomes ‘correct’ by definition, provided it’s widely understood. Obviously for us we can see who’s who by the specific nuances of how people refer to Q
In this case, we need to make the distinction. What you're talking about is public perception based on MSM lies and deceit. Doesn't make it right, nor is it correct and truthful. So, its time to make the distinction public. The truth isn't some grey area to be manipulated. That's [their] game, and if you continue playing that game [their] way, you lose everytime because [they] like to control the public's perception, JUST LIKE the [MSM] is doin with Q.
"There is Q. There are Anons. There is NO "QAnon." Point blank. End of discussion.
Don't fall for that trap any more. Quit using the term "QAnon."
There's loads of us all over social media who have made that distinction very clear. It's time it starts going viral.
No. I’m saying that all language works the way it does and always has done regardless of anyone’s proscriptive wishes. That includes Q, the MSM, you, me and anyone else.
I love this. I wanna know ..who was Q+ ??♂️