There's no such thing as QANON. You're not journalists. You're cheerleaders and "stans" for the pedophilic elites. Q researchers are the new journalists. Learn to code.
Well now, hold on. Let's not be so harsh. If they don't want to learn to code, they could learn to build solar panels instead. ;-)
That is actually a really good question, I think they should answer this one.
I lile from avatar the last surrender, the wheel of punishment. We should use that, just for the traitorous liars from the MSM.
Irrelevant. This is not an anonymous forum. Anon is the name for 4/8/etc-chan users because they have no username by default. You have a name associated with your posts.
Honestly the semantics of "QAnon" are lame - I was there from the start on /pol/, and everyone called him Qanon. All the leakers were referred to like that - FBIanon, CIAanon, et cetera.
Encouraging people to post their research. Seems weve seen this model before with the perfect phone call. They can go fuck off, their heads are exploding. If you thought that was a long fortnight imagine how they feel at cnn. Possibility of hostility still remains high imo
I wouldn't tell them that in the topic of a post. I'd make them read the board for 5 mins so they can figure it out themselves. But yes. Anons are the ones who question things now. "Journalists" are just sycophants.
Here’s some good questions for any retard that says qanon is fake: “Yea, you’re right, qanon doesn’t even exist. There’s Q, and there’s anons. They’re different things. Do you know which came first? Q or Anons? The anons came first, by like a decade. Wanna know how you know the MSM is full of shit? They can’t even discuss Q and anons honestly. They say qanon is debunked. But Q obviously exists. The posts are there, how can it be debunked? The interesting question is what is Q’s objective. Q is obviously trying to influence public discourse, but to what end? And for as concerned as the MSM is in foreign influence of our elections, they seem alarmingly unconcerned about who Q actually is (foreign or domestic). So let’s start there: who is Q and what are Q’s objectives?
This is where any thinking person realizes how hollow the MSM is. There are interesting questions about Q to ponder, and the MSM is saying “debunked, don’t look at it!”
The goal is to get them digging, and I’ve had luck with this approach with normies
I keep seeing this but isn’t it a little semantic? If you’re anons who follow and interpret Q posts, is Qanon not an appropriate name to distinguish from other anons? I understand not wanting to let the media frame things but I think we have more important things to worry about than what label they are using when they come for you.
I didn’t say you “follow Q” like a leader or something I said you follow and interpret the posts Q has made, as in keeping track. That is what we do here correct? Putting it all together. Again, I’m just saying when they come for us, it really doesn’t matter what they call us.
Man they’re not gonna reach out through the damn computer. They’re targeting patriots of all kinds, and when they come for them, some Q folks will be caught up in the mix. VPN don’t make that flag you hang outside disappear, or do you just feign being a normie in real life to blend in?
So what you’re saying is, you have given up your freedom of expression in exchange for safety from government persecution? Have fun living on your knees because it was the “smart” choice.
LOOK AT US. WE ARE THE JOURNALISTS NOW.
We have sources
Well now, hold on. Let's not be so harsh. If they don't want to learn to code, they could learn to build solar panels instead. ;-)
BQQM
Sshhhhh. Don't tell em.
and PS, since you aided and abetted a treasonous election, in what manner to you believe your sentences should be carried out?
That is actually a really good question, I think they should answer this one. I lile from avatar the last surrender, the wheel of punishment. We should use that, just for the traitorous liars from the MSM.
Q is a team of approximately 10 patriots, not a single person. don’t remember the Q drop outlining this at the moment.
Where are they now though?
are you referring to why no Q drops as of late?
This needs stickied so the people in the back can see too
uh... we aren't anons. we have usernames...
Irrelevant. This is not an anonymous forum. Anon is the name for 4/8/etc-chan users because they have no username by default. You have a name associated with your posts.
Honestly the semantics of "QAnon" are lame - I was there from the start on /pol/, and everyone called him Qanon. All the leakers were referred to like that - FBIanon, CIAanon, et cetera.
Encouraging people to post their research. Seems weve seen this model before with the perfect phone call. They can go fuck off, their heads are exploding. If you thought that was a long fortnight imagine how they feel at cnn. Possibility of hostility still remains high imo
Lol, Learn to code.
I wouldn't tell them that in the topic of a post. I'd make them read the board for 5 mins so they can figure it out themselves. But yes. Anons are the ones who question things now. "Journalists" are just sycophants.
They dont figure out anything. They make up what they want to sell the story they want.
I would be more shocked if CNN used the correct terms. I assume they will soon have a breaking expose claiming Qanon is the hacker known as 4chan.
Here’s some good questions for any retard that says qanon is fake: “Yea, you’re right, qanon doesn’t even exist. There’s Q, and there’s anons. They’re different things. Do you know which came first? Q or Anons? The anons came first, by like a decade. Wanna know how you know the MSM is full of shit? They can’t even discuss Q and anons honestly. They say qanon is debunked. But Q obviously exists. The posts are there, how can it be debunked? The interesting question is what is Q’s objective. Q is obviously trying to influence public discourse, but to what end? And for as concerned as the MSM is in foreign influence of our elections, they seem alarmingly unconcerned about who Q actually is (foreign or domestic). So let’s start there: who is Q and what are Q’s objectives?
This is where any thinking person realizes how hollow the MSM is. There are interesting questions about Q to ponder, and the MSM is saying “debunked, don’t look at it!”
The goal is to get them digging, and I’ve had luck with this approach with normies
F*ck em. Why even bother acknowledging them?
I keep seeing this but isn’t it a little semantic? If you’re anons who follow and interpret Q posts, is Qanon not an appropriate name to distinguish from other anons? I understand not wanting to let the media frame things but I think we have more important things to worry about than what label they are using when they come for you.
I didn’t say you “follow Q” like a leader or something I said you follow and interpret the posts Q has made, as in keeping track. That is what we do here correct? Putting it all together. Again, I’m just saying when they come for us, it really doesn’t matter what they call us.
Man they’re not gonna reach out through the damn computer. They’re targeting patriots of all kinds, and when they come for them, some Q folks will be caught up in the mix. VPN don’t make that flag you hang outside disappear, or do you just feign being a normie in real life to blend in?
So what you’re saying is, you have given up your freedom of expression in exchange for safety from government persecution? Have fun living on your knees because it was the “smart” choice.