It’s confusing to me because even though Dr. Steve Pieczenik has a spotty record, he mentions ideas that track with Q many times....yet says he knows nothing of Q and said on A SHOW “Pompeo was a disaster” and Pompeo seems like a white hat.....
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (58)
sorted by:
Uh, pretty clearly it was.
Ok, then you have no opinion on Dr. Steve, and aren’t familiar with him....very constructive input.
He has been on Alex Jones on many occasions. Alex Jones is Mossad backed controlled opposition. Any of his common show attendees are also highly suspect. That does not automatically mean Dr. Steve Pieczenik is bad, but it automatically makes him suspect.
I'm not going to watch it, but if he is badmouthing Pompeo (unless he is a white hat putting forth disinformation) that's just another nail in his coffin.
Thanks.... Dr. Steve Pieczenik had much hopium, and it had nothing to do with Jones, who was more annoying and attempted to undermine Dr. Steve Pieczenik at every chance.
That's all they do. He says things, Jones interrupts him and doesn't let him talk. It just seems so contrived to me. There are multiple levels to disinformation. Be aware of the pitfalls of hopium.
I thought it would be a simple question, and expected answers like “ Dr. Steve Pieczenik has an alien mother” or something.....not AJ being the focus.
The Dr. said “Pence and Pompeo were both disasters.” So it’s good to hear opinions about the Dr.....and not AJ.
I'm not entirely sure what you are looking for. I don't trust him further than I can throw him. I don't trust him because he's on AJ all the time, and AJ can not be trusted period. This is a DISINFORMATION WAR. Controlled opposition is a huge part of disinformation. Controlled opposition is people who appear to be on YOUR side giving out false information to change perception and belief, to distract from exploration of truth.
I have seen him say things I like, and I have seen him say things that are provably false. That to me means he is AT BEST not trustworthy. But most important, if he is bad-mouthing Pompeo he better have some DAMNED good proof, and I mean PROOF of such an assertion or he gets to be on my forever banned list.
Is that sufficiently "about the Dr" for you?