Conspiracy theories are being attacked right now by the media....wait, just one of them. The true one about election fraud and how the left stole the presidency (with the help of Republicans). That "conspiracy theory" you can't talk about without being shut down, banned, cancelled, etc.
But flat earth, moon landings, JFK, Federal Reserve, and all the others? They're just fine and don't deceive the public at all apparently. Just one is dangerous, and so dangerous it must at all costs be censored.
The election rigging. The difference is 100% provable truth. And it terrifies the left to think their sheep could be convinced of its truth and that they really did steal the presidency.
Every time I see the term ‘conspiracy theory’ I am reminded of how stupid the deep state is...
It goes to show their lack of word knowledge..
A theory is a term that has always been used in science to give relevance to a scientific idea.. so a theory was always the end result of the scientific method..
We have the theory of gravity, relativity, evolution, etc...
These ideas are accepted as fact until/unless some further evidence would arise to change or further substantiate said theory. This is why it is called a theory and not a fact.
A hypothesis is an idea and the beginning of the scientific method.. ask the question etc..
So in summation by calling us conspiracy theorists, they are proving that we are correct as they offer no evidence to refute our theories and theories are subject to change based on facts..
In the way they use the term, they are the actual conspiracy theorists according to their meaning of the word-not us..
Saying something is debunked is different from it actually being deboonked.. our ‘conspiracy theories’ have actual meat on the bone that HAS NOT been deboonked.. a lot of the stuff Q talks about is stuff that has been researched and proven through evidence long before Q was a thought.. which just gives more validity to the Q research board!
Thanks for this. I always get confused between hypothesis and theory. Your explanation helps.
Have you noticed the frequent use of “debunked” and the group of people who use it most frequently?