Killary tweets yesterday at 1:48 pm about a Qanon piece in New York Times.
Go to Q drop 148
Q Drop 148 literally states the exact same thing, “NYT/Clowns In America article released today re: Q-group is a DIRECT attack“.
Coincidence?
PATRIOTS ARE IN CONTROL!
- @MzMidniteRider333 post
(media.greatawakening.win)
Q-incidence!
People, this isn't how you decode Q-drops. You don't just match the timestamp of a person's tweet to a Q-drop number and try to find connections. Q used to drop multiple crumbs per day so it's important to read all of them in sequence for that particular day to grasp the context. If you study drops #145 to #148 you'll realize that Q was referring to this NYT article published back in November 12, 2017: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/12/us/nsa-shadow-brokers.html
Q drops 145-148 https://qalerts.pub/?q=%23145%7C%23146%7C%23147%7C%23148&sortasc=1
Please do your due diligence and learn Q's comms.
How many times has Q states "multiple meanings." Also, thick skin here so I just don't care if you criticize me, but think of all the burgeoning newbies that a remark like yours discourages...it was not made in the spirit of Q. You should guide. Even I do not know many/most of the comm's and to imply those like me should keep our mouths shut until we do is wrong. #BeBest
Q has only used the term "multiple meanings" once (in #2524) and I can assure you he wasn't referring to timestamps having multiple meanings. The main significance of the Twitter timestamps is for Q to verify to us his coordination with Trump. What will happen is Q will post something first on the boards and POTUS will tweet something related within seconds or minutes, confirming their synchronicity. This has happened several dozen times and is what we refer to as "deltas" within the community. Q has never said nor inferred that we should be using timestamps, much less timestamp from people not on Trump's team (ie. Hillary), to match a Q-drop number.
As someone who has been following Q since the beginning, I feel that posting wrong decodes is a terrible way to introduce Q to newbies because we're encouraging bad habits and leading them down the wrong rabbit holes. I did guide. I actually posted the drops and taught people how to read the drops in sequence and learn their context before jumping to conclusions.
"The spirit of Q" is to research for yourself and think logically. I detected zero research and zero logical thinking spawned by this "decode", only people speculating about time travel and body doubles. Meanwhile, nobody know how this remotely pertains to our current circumstances or the plan, so I had to bring people back to reality.
"...so I had to bring people back to reality." Sounds grandiose.
How many does he have, and have you learned all of them? Some of them seem to stump even the most ardent students.
One thing many people miss is that Q is a person (or a team of people) who often interacted with the board. Early on, he'd correct anons for misinterpreting his drops and give props to anons who decoded them correctly. When anons asked for proofs, Q would plan something with POTUS to prove their coordination. Q even did Q&As. Yes, Q dumped a lot of precisely-written intel but he also spent a lot of time building trust with the community. It was a two-way relationship. That's why I say people need to read the drops in context instead of jumping to a drop # based on some arbitrary timestamp because that wasn't how Q worked.
As far as comms go, I highly recommend picking up Praying Medic's first book in his Q series. He does an excellent job teaching people how to decipher a Q post. It's worth every penny. Unfortunately, Amazon banned his books and Youtube deleted all of his "intro to Q" videos: https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/calm-before-the-storm-denise-hayes/1136279781?ean=9781734552522