The 4 facets of fraud convolute everything. If you ONLY take the numbers from the "seized precincts" that had fixed ratios that were intended to massively manipulate the vote during the smallest timeframe, then the data can be extrapolated to some degree, but will never be perfectly known. Until an actual ballot audit is done, by human only, eye/paper/markings, then compared that to the poll books on WHO came in to vote, we won't know 100%.
Example, Precinct Rose High School, 1,000 voters showed up out of 2,000. 50% voter participation rate.
Is that rate consistent with years prior, if not, how much is it off % wise?
Pollbooks, WHO came to vote, who were the 1,000 voters? How were they registered? Does the % of registered voters match the turnout within an acceptable margin, or is it way off? (example, 700 REP voted, 300 DEM voted; Biden got 600 votes, Trump 400. That is a problem, because that states Biden got DOUBLE the number of votes awarded to him, compared to the number of DEM who actually voted.)
Evaluate the STATE data, find the TIME this precinct was "Seized" and locked at a fixed ratio of vote appropriation. (example, 4 PM till 5:30 PM, 90 minutes this precinct reported a fixed ratio of 9:1 in favor of Biden. So no matter who people voted for, while the vote tallies were reported for that 90 minutes and remember the "bucket process" where votes can be held back and reported in a controlled fashion, every 10 votes, 9 went to Biden and 1 went to Trump. The RATIO was based on the TIME and VOTES counted, to ensure that precinct was responsible for an EXACT number of votes flipped/manipulated, so that when ALL manipulated precincts had completed their reporting, from REAL results and from BUCKET results, that the final outcome would be 51% Biden, 48% Trump and 1% other.)
To correct this, is difficult because of the "bucket" state of votes, we don't know how many votes were put into limbo, compared to how many were reported directly and allowed to pass through the system. (Example, from Noon till 4PM, 400 votes were cast, but only 200 votes were reported over that 4 hours, the other 200 votes were held in the "bucket", because the cheating algorithm knew it needed to "seize and ratio an X number of votes", so then from 4pm till 5:30PM, there were 150 REAL votes reported, but manipulated in the awarding of those votes at a 9:1 ratio favoring Biden. Then additionally the 200 bucketed votes were dumped into the reporting stream and they too were manipulated against the algorithm ratio of 9:1. So in this 90 minute period there were 350 votes tallied and they were assigned 9:1, which would BOOST Biden votes from THAT Precinct for that 90 minutes. Once that 90 minutes were up, the "seize" would be released and the actual/natural numbers would continue to be reported for the rest of the night.)
When a precinct is "seized for ratio manipulation", the real numbers flow in prior and after. Once a precinct or multiple precincts are "released from seizure", the algorithm has new targets that are taken over and "seized" and the process keeps repeating all night, through many precincts, until the "KEY NUMBER" of votes that were initially input has been "secured"... Democrats love to "SECURE" elections... TIME MAGAZINE.
So, fixing it as best as we can with what we have. DISCARD all votes that were reported DURING a seized time period. Set that vote total aside. Calculate the TOTALS from BEFORE/AFTER Seizing period. Find your average. Divide the "Set aside phony votes that were ratio manipulated", using the REAL percentage from the prior/after REAL results... once allocated, you have a high reliability assumption of the real results.
This election was not close, not at all. In order for the cheaters to get their desired numbers, they had to FLIP and DELETE millions of votes, taking them away from Trump, giving some to Biden, giving some to 3rd party and outright erasing many from the history books altogether.
Again, their problem, why the computer cheating failed was due to the underestimation of voter turnout and how that additional turnout HEAVILY sided with Trump. Their projected SAFE NUMBER to ensure a Biden 51% win, was sunk by the RED WAVE of the late Trump momentum of election day votes.
That is why voting had to stop. All the votes were in, it was over and done. They simply lied, stated MORE VOTES DUE IN, the "Total reported in for almost all these locations was stuck at 97% for tens of thousands of votes, because they had to increase their "max expected turnout" so the fraud would stay hidden.
The computer cheaters did not count on the other cheaters to be so over the top in their responses, no communications, no coordination was ready for what happened due to that RED WAVE.
Tabulators OFF, scanners humming, fraud ballots flying thru over and over again. When they turned the tabulators back on... OH FUCKING SHIT< SPIKE SPIKE SPIKE! That is when we can see the VERTICLE line spike up in votes for Biden. That is how they fucked up.
The transmitted reports from precinct to central tabulation happened once. The data was ratio'd via the Ballot Marking Devices (BMD) +ImageCastMachines (IC) (printer/scanners that make digital ballot images), OR by the BMD alone, or by the IC alone. Could have started with BMDs preprogrammed to a fixed ratio and set to turn ON and OFF at specific times, then additional cheating could have been done later by Central connecting into any ImageCast machines that were online or had connectivity. (maybe all of the ICs were connected, maybe some were, we don't know).
Regardless, the data was transmitted correctly for about the first 20% of the total expected vote, then the modifications kicked in, cascading throughout nearly all precincts that they NEEDED to target for changes. Believe it or not, the MOST vote FLIPPING happened in REPUBLICAN heavy counties. These counties REALLY showed up for Trump, some of them hitting 85% turnout and having 75% of the vote to Trump.
Cheaters targetted these areas because they could STEAL around 15-20% of that 75% Trump vote, give it to Biden, or just delete it to make Trumps overall numbers lower and make him look less popular. Had they not stolen from Trump and deleted from Trump, then Trump would have likely (across all 50 states) gotten well over 100,000,000 votes. If you didn't flip/delete those Trump votes, how could you possibly justify him losing? How could you even CREATE enough Biden votes without FLIPPING them from Trump to Biden, or without DELETING Trumps votes? You can't, you simply cannot. Trump would get 100,000,000 and Biden 101,000,000? LOL, Ok. That is rediculous and why they didn't go that route. The route they took ended up rediculous anyway.
The fraud is so simply. Look at the NATIONAL Total Number of Registered Legal Voters. Look at the Officially Reported PERCENTAGE of Voter Participation this year based on all 50 states POLL BOOKS (that is the record of PEOPLE< REAL PEOPLE who signed their name in to get access to vote). The POLL BOOKS state around 67% of the TOTAL voted.
When you take 67% of the Total Legal Number Nationally Registered, you have a problem. You come up SHORT tens of million voter by the poll books.
It could be, yet the data could also be hit once it left the data centers like Scytl and Clarity, Paragon. Massive straight up vote deletions could have happened at that stage.
The timestamped precinct level data, is what I am focused on. This is where we can actually SHOW anywhere from 1 to 15 precincts at a time within a state being assigned a "seize state" and then ALL of them reporting the exact same fixed ratio's across all of the precincts over multiple updates (impossible).
Imagine your state has 1000 reporting precincts and it is 6PM on election day. All 1000 of them have been reporting in all day long, not a single time did ANY of them have the exact same ratio, or ever repeat a ratio a single time.
Then all a sudden, 15 of the 1000 precincts report their votes at 7PM, the vote TOTALS are all different, you have the following totals coming in across the 10 voting locations... 10 votes, 20 votes, 30 votes, 40 votes, 50 votes, 100 votes, 200 votes, 300 votes, 400 votes, 500 votes.
However the disbursement of those votes are ALL the same fixed ratio 9:1 Biden to Trump.
So it would look like this> Biden:Trump > got, 9:1 votes, 18:2 votes, 27:3 votes, 36:4 votes, 45:5 votes, 90:10, 180:20, 270:30, 360:40, 450:50.
Let's total them up.
BIDEN: 1,485 votes during the "seized reporting period with the 9:1 ratio"
TRUMP: 165 votes during the "seized reporting period with the 9:1 ratio"
Prior to, and After the "seizing" of these precincts, Trump had been getting 60% of the vote and Biden 40%.
If we reversed the cheating, then we take the total number of votes cast during that period: 1,485 + 165 = 1650. We assign 40% of that total to Biden and the remainder to Trump.
BIDEN: 40% of 1650 = 660 votes - based on prior and after % return rates
TRUMP: 60% of 1650 = 990 votes - based on prior and after % return rates
So how much damage was done by the "algorithm" while it had "seized" those 10 precincts while those 1650 votes came in?
BIDEN had a fraudulent GAIN of 825 votes that, stolen from Trump.
TRUMP had a stolen LOSS of 825 votes that, were given to Biden.
This is a 50% increase in all votes reported being assigned to Biden and a 50% loss in all votes reported going to Trump.
This is a massive swing in votes and could easily change a sure win into a narrow loss at the precinct level.
When you do this across multiple or all precincts, then it changes the outcome of the entire state.
The 4 facets of fraud convolute everything. If you ONLY take the numbers from the "seized precincts" that had fixed ratios that were intended to massively manipulate the vote during the smallest timeframe, then the data can be extrapolated to some degree, but will never be perfectly known. Until an actual ballot audit is done, by human only, eye/paper/markings, then compared that to the poll books on WHO came in to vote, we won't know 100%.
Example, Precinct Rose High School, 1,000 voters showed up out of 2,000. 50% voter participation rate.
Is that rate consistent with years prior, if not, how much is it off % wise?
Pollbooks, WHO came to vote, who were the 1,000 voters? How were they registered? Does the % of registered voters match the turnout within an acceptable margin, or is it way off? (example, 700 REP voted, 300 DEM voted; Biden got 600 votes, Trump 400. That is a problem, because that states Biden got DOUBLE the number of votes awarded to him, compared to the number of DEM who actually voted.)
Evaluate the STATE data, find the TIME this precinct was "Seized" and locked at a fixed ratio of vote appropriation. (example, 4 PM till 5:30 PM, 90 minutes this precinct reported a fixed ratio of 9:1 in favor of Biden. So no matter who people voted for, while the vote tallies were reported for that 90 minutes and remember the "bucket process" where votes can be held back and reported in a controlled fashion, every 10 votes, 9 went to Biden and 1 went to Trump. The RATIO was based on the TIME and VOTES counted, to ensure that precinct was responsible for an EXACT number of votes flipped/manipulated, so that when ALL manipulated precincts had completed their reporting, from REAL results and from BUCKET results, that the final outcome would be 51% Biden, 48% Trump and 1% other.)
To correct this, is difficult because of the "bucket" state of votes, we don't know how many votes were put into limbo, compared to how many were reported directly and allowed to pass through the system. (Example, from Noon till 4PM, 400 votes were cast, but only 200 votes were reported over that 4 hours, the other 200 votes were held in the "bucket", because the cheating algorithm knew it needed to "seize and ratio an X number of votes", so then from 4pm till 5:30PM, there were 150 REAL votes reported, but manipulated in the awarding of those votes at a 9:1 ratio favoring Biden. Then additionally the 200 bucketed votes were dumped into the reporting stream and they too were manipulated against the algorithm ratio of 9:1. So in this 90 minute period there were 350 votes tallied and they were assigned 9:1, which would BOOST Biden votes from THAT Precinct for that 90 minutes. Once that 90 minutes were up, the "seize" would be released and the actual/natural numbers would continue to be reported for the rest of the night.)
When a precinct is "seized for ratio manipulation", the real numbers flow in prior and after. Once a precinct or multiple precincts are "released from seizure", the algorithm has new targets that are taken over and "seized" and the process keeps repeating all night, through many precincts, until the "KEY NUMBER" of votes that were initially input has been "secured"... Democrats love to "SECURE" elections... TIME MAGAZINE.
So, fixing it as best as we can with what we have. DISCARD all votes that were reported DURING a seized time period. Set that vote total aside. Calculate the TOTALS from BEFORE/AFTER Seizing period. Find your average. Divide the "Set aside phony votes that were ratio manipulated", using the REAL percentage from the prior/after REAL results... once allocated, you have a high reliability assumption of the real results.
This election was not close, not at all. In order for the cheaters to get their desired numbers, they had to FLIP and DELETE millions of votes, taking them away from Trump, giving some to Biden, giving some to 3rd party and outright erasing many from the history books altogether.
Again, their problem, why the computer cheating failed was due to the underestimation of voter turnout and how that additional turnout HEAVILY sided with Trump. Their projected SAFE NUMBER to ensure a Biden 51% win, was sunk by the RED WAVE of the late Trump momentum of election day votes.
That is why voting had to stop. All the votes were in, it was over and done. They simply lied, stated MORE VOTES DUE IN, the "Total reported in for almost all these locations was stuck at 97% for tens of thousands of votes, because they had to increase their "max expected turnout" so the fraud would stay hidden.
The computer cheaters did not count on the other cheaters to be so over the top in their responses, no communications, no coordination was ready for what happened due to that RED WAVE.
Tabulators OFF, scanners humming, fraud ballots flying thru over and over again. When they turned the tabulators back on... OH FUCKING SHIT< SPIKE SPIKE SPIKE! That is when we can see the VERTICLE line spike up in votes for Biden. That is how they fucked up.
The transmitted reports from precinct to central tabulation happened once. The data was ratio'd via the Ballot Marking Devices (BMD) +ImageCastMachines (IC) (printer/scanners that make digital ballot images), OR by the BMD alone, or by the IC alone. Could have started with BMDs preprogrammed to a fixed ratio and set to turn ON and OFF at specific times, then additional cheating could have been done later by Central connecting into any ImageCast machines that were online or had connectivity. (maybe all of the ICs were connected, maybe some were, we don't know).
Regardless, the data was transmitted correctly for about the first 20% of the total expected vote, then the modifications kicked in, cascading throughout nearly all precincts that they NEEDED to target for changes. Believe it or not, the MOST vote FLIPPING happened in REPUBLICAN heavy counties. These counties REALLY showed up for Trump, some of them hitting 85% turnout and having 75% of the vote to Trump.
Cheaters targetted these areas because they could STEAL around 15-20% of that 75% Trump vote, give it to Biden, or just delete it to make Trumps overall numbers lower and make him look less popular. Had they not stolen from Trump and deleted from Trump, then Trump would have likely (across all 50 states) gotten well over 100,000,000 votes. If you didn't flip/delete those Trump votes, how could you possibly justify him losing? How could you even CREATE enough Biden votes without FLIPPING them from Trump to Biden, or without DELETING Trumps votes? You can't, you simply cannot. Trump would get 100,000,000 and Biden 101,000,000? LOL, Ok. That is rediculous and why they didn't go that route. The route they took ended up rediculous anyway.
The fraud is so simply. Look at the NATIONAL Total Number of Registered Legal Voters. Look at the Officially Reported PERCENTAGE of Voter Participation this year based on all 50 states POLL BOOKS (that is the record of PEOPLE< REAL PEOPLE who signed their name in to get access to vote). The POLL BOOKS state around 67% of the TOTAL voted.
When you take 67% of the Total Legal Number Nationally Registered, you have a problem. You come up SHORT tens of million voter by the poll books.
Check it for yourself.
It could be, yet the data could also be hit once it left the data centers like Scytl and Clarity, Paragon. Massive straight up vote deletions could have happened at that stage.
The timestamped precinct level data, is what I am focused on. This is where we can actually SHOW anywhere from 1 to 15 precincts at a time within a state being assigned a "seize state" and then ALL of them reporting the exact same fixed ratio's across all of the precincts over multiple updates (impossible).
Imagine your state has 1000 reporting precincts and it is 6PM on election day. All 1000 of them have been reporting in all day long, not a single time did ANY of them have the exact same ratio, or ever repeat a ratio a single time.
Then all a sudden, 15 of the 1000 precincts report their votes at 7PM, the vote TOTALS are all different, you have the following totals coming in across the 10 voting locations... 10 votes, 20 votes, 30 votes, 40 votes, 50 votes, 100 votes, 200 votes, 300 votes, 400 votes, 500 votes.
However the disbursement of those votes are ALL the same fixed ratio 9:1 Biden to Trump.
So it would look like this> Biden:Trump > got, 9:1 votes, 18:2 votes, 27:3 votes, 36:4 votes, 45:5 votes, 90:10, 180:20, 270:30, 360:40, 450:50.
Let's total them up.
BIDEN: 1,485 votes during the "seized reporting period with the 9:1 ratio" TRUMP: 165 votes during the "seized reporting period with the 9:1 ratio"
Prior to, and After the "seizing" of these precincts, Trump had been getting 60% of the vote and Biden 40%.
If we reversed the cheating, then we take the total number of votes cast during that period: 1,485 + 165 = 1650. We assign 40% of that total to Biden and the remainder to Trump.
BIDEN: 40% of 1650 = 660 votes - based on prior and after % return rates TRUMP: 60% of 1650 = 990 votes - based on prior and after % return rates
So how much damage was done by the "algorithm" while it had "seized" those 10 precincts while those 1650 votes came in?
BIDEN had a fraudulent GAIN of 825 votes that, stolen from Trump. TRUMP had a stolen LOSS of 825 votes that, were given to Biden.
This is a 50% increase in all votes reported being assigned to Biden and a 50% loss in all votes reported going to Trump.
This is a massive swing in votes and could easily change a sure win into a narrow loss at the precinct level.
When you do this across multiple or all precincts, then it changes the outcome of the entire state.