Over the weekend I followed a link to a NYT article where Hilary was ( in the last week?) referencing Qanon alongside references to many of her alleged misdemeanours. This morning whilst queueing next to the newspaper stand I scanned all the front pages.Normally they all go with Covid related crap. Rothschild controlled Guardian had its front page dedicated to the Queen complete with large photograph( in purple) and a story of how she tried to hide her wealth and income from the people. This story is a result of a recent search of the National Archives and goes back to the 70’s.
The connection and relevance. The Hilary email trove contained exchanges with Lynn Forester de Rothschild where Hilary seems to be grovelling and apologetic( not one of her traits). I think the NYT article is a hit piece on her to prepare for her being thrown under the bus.
The Queen is ( perceived) as a 95 year old granny. We are in crisis and she is head of state her husband is 99years old. Why publish a front page hit piece on her?
Is it because they are pulling up the ladder because they have calculated that her favourite son is one of the Worlds 10 most wanted? Coupled with Charles and his friends ( Greta and Schwab) and Harry being persona non grata in the UK. It’s looking grim for the monarchy.
Well, they did appear to have some real control over twitter hardware and software(likely still do when it comes to NSA backdoors into twitter software but just stopped using it to help their own account due to 'move to gab' narrative) as they tweeted a lot of stuff that got other accounts banned but twitter tried on numerous occasions to ban them and failing miserably every time.....
And as mentioned, good chance that while on the surface and day-to-day running GAB appears to be a private undertaking, the actual GAB backbone and core infrastructure is likely to be military(NSA/DOD) controlled..