If you are thinking that the Senate "sham-peachment" trial is going to reveal ANYTHING or be even remotely fair and informational... guess again.
The sham-peachment is for Senators and Congressmen to bloviate, accuse each other of things that BOTH parties are doing, politicians to get 15-seconds of face-time on TV for throwing verbal jabs at others... and then vote on a pre-determined verdict.
Trump will be found guilty by 50%+ majority of doing something that he clearly never did... but there won't be enough votes to kick him out of an office that he no longer holds. :>)
Spend your time watching the Weather Channel instead.
I got plenty of down votes in the past 2 weeks for stating same thing. Shame that so few never try to educate themselves even after I pointed out that Trump won't be able to present any elections fraud evidence based on Senate impeachment rules. Kudos to you. And by the looks of it, libtards are now trying to cut out ANY witness testimony, as I predicted as well, since it will expose their prior shams of openly calling for BLMAntifa anarchy during 2020.
I only have one correction. I don't think libtards have the 50+ votes, and its the only question mark I have left in regard to this clown show. And, as one Senate idiot already stated, He doesn't have enough libtard support for 50+ to use the 14A to censure Trump (and achieve same result as impeachment conviction would). That said, I would not put it past these azzholes to try it, anyway, once they fail with impeachment conviction. Watch Chucky shift to it soon after.
What I will be watching for is just one thing: By Senate impeachment rules every Senator is allowed no more than 10 minutes to speak up, and I will keep a tally of all those on the GOPe side who do so. All those not doing their job should be primeried, don't care how "good" their conservative creds may be. Looking at Cruz, Paul, Cotton, etc. So far, just talk.
If you are thinking that the Senate "sham-peachment" trial is going to reveal ANYTHING or be even remotely fair and informational... guess again.
The sham-peachment is for Senators and Congressmen to bloviate, accuse each other of things that BOTH parties are doing, politicians to get 15-seconds of face-time on TV for throwing verbal jabs at others... and then vote on a pre-determined verdict.
Trump will be found guilty by 50%+ majority of doing something that he clearly never did... but there won't be enough votes to kick him out of an office that he no longer holds. :>)
Spend your time watching the Weather Channel instead.
"Bloviate"... Good word choice
I got plenty of down votes in the past 2 weeks for stating same thing. Shame that so few never try to educate themselves even after I pointed out that Trump won't be able to present any elections fraud evidence based on Senate impeachment rules. Kudos to you. And by the looks of it, libtards are now trying to cut out ANY witness testimony, as I predicted as well, since it will expose their prior shams of openly calling for BLMAntifa anarchy during 2020.
I only have one correction. I don't think libtards have the 50+ votes, and its the only question mark I have left in regard to this clown show. And, as one Senate idiot already stated, He doesn't have enough libtard support for 50+ to use the 14A to censure Trump (and achieve same result as impeachment conviction would). That said, I would not put it past these azzholes to try it, anyway, once they fail with impeachment conviction. Watch Chucky shift to it soon after.
What I will be watching for is just one thing: By Senate impeachment rules every Senator is allowed no more than 10 minutes to speak up, and I will keep a tally of all those on the GOPe side who do so. All those not doing their job should be primeried, don't care how "good" their conservative creds may be. Looking at Cruz, Paul, Cotton, etc. So far, just talk.