I think they control the world's intelligence services through the Vatican and Central Intelligence Agency headquarters in Switzerland. I think the royal families still have major influence and control and are involved in human trafficking and the worst perversions and atrocities imaginable and have been for centuries. Remember the Countess who bathed in blood? I think the families have used Talmudic Jews as fronts and scapegoats so we suspect nothing as their movie plays out. I think maybe when the Temple is rebuilt the Pope will rule there as the head of a one Unified World Church. I think the Church has altered history and used prophecy and numerology to seed the ideas and dates of future events. I think this has been going on for all of recorded history. I think the secret societies have been major forces of history that go undiscussed. I think the Pilgrim's Society and the Knights of Malta are integral to understanding the history of America and they are almost never mentioned. I think the Knights of Pythias and the Order of the Garter need to be deep dived on. I think the Freemasons role in world events is seriously understated. I think all of history is the movie. I'm afraid Donald Trump is a Mason. I wonder what Q really is because I came to very disconcerting thoughts by following the Owl and Y Head around the world, learning the language and symbolism of the Cabal, and seeing that symbology all over Trump Tower.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (38)
sorted by:
I had to think of this song:
https://youtu.be/E5VMZqgVzRo
I belief the description miss Fitts gave of what the objective here is , is correct.
Take: the free flow of information. Information can be exchanged. Information therefore is representing value. Value means it can be leveraged.
In the Y heads world, free flow of information is like a river running wild.
We are in a system where we are considered to be products delivered from the water, and docked, manifested, certified, etc.
one has to wonder about the owners.
Let's suppose God made us. In that sense we are basically born free. This is the basis of the Declaration of independence, the Bill of Rights and both the Constitution and the Act of Abjuration.
Let's suppose, like Sitchin does, we are the result of genetic experiments, or what geneticist call: add mixture. I won't get into the nitty gritty per race, as that is a different rabbit hole. If we are the result of genetic experiments, we have to suppose objective.
And just like some BLS4 labs I could mention have an escaped product, what if we are just that: descendants of escaped products. The fact that we can procreate, does not mean, the descendants are free or self owned. We still bear the marks of being owned, without having obtained our letter of liberty.
Suppose our ancestors once obtained that letter. But the previous owners have gone back on their agreement?
Suppose our ancestors rebelled and killed the makers? Does that mean that other makers could not lay claim? Or try to subjugate?
Mankind is a dangerous species.
What if, just some of us, considered this and thought, you know, we actually could pull this off, and subjugate the rest, just for being able to do it.
If I would consider all technological advances in nature, they are, on the one hand advantageous to sustain life and procreation, on the other to kill other life and end procreation.
This whole idea of sustainability, environmentalism, is one big hoax. Why? because it is not framed in terms of: getting the best male and female together, have a go at each other, and make babies.
Instead it is used to subjugate within all kinds of consensus data-ism in an attempt to outdo the delusions of grandeur of the ego.
With this in mind, I am not at all worried about running the whole system into the ground. It must be, just like an old willow tree, allowing new sprouts to grow.
Look at this: https://metager3.de/en/meta/meta.ger3?eingabe=knotwilgen&focus=bilder
artificial vs natural.
The question is: can it be guided and can the dark-ages be limited?
In this sense, the Foundation series by Isaac Asimov is quite interesting. 2 foundations. 2 objectives, with the ultimate goal to save what can be saved: physically and spiritually.
So, why interfere with an enemy who is in the process of destroying himself?, is a question that I am probing while considering all that is going on.
Is destruction a given? A consequence of their system? An inevitable consequence because it is unnatural?
And when we look back into history, are we looking at one grand plan, or are we looking at several emanations, failing every time?
I really liked the Foundation series and I guess I am sort of positing that the Cabal is working like an evil Second Foundation, sucking up patents on anything that could break our paradigm and controlling history and events according to their creepy numerology behind the scenes. People before me have already said Sitchins is part of a Vatican plot to direct us toward Luciferian doctrines:
https://archive.org/details/TheVaticansUfoAgenda