From Merriam-Webster: Though "deem" is still frequently used in law contexts, today it means "judge" only in a broader sense of "to decide (something specified) regarding," as in "the act was deemed unlawful" or "the defendant is deemed to have agreed to the contract." Outside of the law, "deem" usually means simply "to consider."
So we see "...claims it deems false.." Notice Suckerberg isn't saying the claims ARE false. Suckerberg is just going to take them down even if they are true, because Faceplant deems them false.
Yes but I remember listening to Dan bongino when he personally witnessed as the lefties were changing actual definitions in dictionaries LOL just you wait.
Deem is nothing, always has been. What is the burden of proof to deem something? Zero. What is the minimal degree of expertise or familiarity with the subject before someone can deem something pertaining to the subject? Zero.
It means an uninformed opinion by one random person apropos nothing. Why is something so insignificant elevated to such importance that huge consequences pivot around it? Because its criminal and fraudulent and moneyed crime interests are all about promoting and propagating fraud.
In a courtcase, if someone deaf and blind and far removed from the crime scene took the stand to give expert testimony on a field they were illiterate in, would that be worth anything? No. The mere act is a fraud on the court.
Meant to say clairvoyant. Not telekinetic lol but you get the idea!
awwwww i wanted that.
From Merriam-Webster: Though "deem" is still frequently used in law contexts, today it means "judge" only in a broader sense of "to decide (something specified) regarding," as in "the act was deemed unlawful" or "the defendant is deemed to have agreed to the contract." Outside of the law, "deem" usually means simply "to consider." So we see "...claims it deems false.." Notice Suckerberg isn't saying the claims ARE false. Suckerberg is just going to take them down even if they are true, because Faceplant deems them false.
Yes but I remember listening to Dan bongino when he personally witnessed as the lefties were changing actual definitions in dictionaries LOL just you wait.
Yes I remember that too.
Deem is nothing, always has been. What is the burden of proof to deem something? Zero. What is the minimal degree of expertise or familiarity with the subject before someone can deem something pertaining to the subject? Zero.
It means an uninformed opinion by one random person apropos nothing. Why is something so insignificant elevated to such importance that huge consequences pivot around it? Because its criminal and fraudulent and moneyed crime interests are all about promoting and propagating fraud.
In a courtcase, if someone deaf and blind and far removed from the crime scene took the stand to give expert testimony on a field they were illiterate in, would that be worth anything? No. The mere act is a fraud on the court.
An “Expert Class” = GLOBALISM 101
Because they know what's best for the rest of us. We should all just comply....Heavy Sarcasm intended.