I wasn’t whining about being down voted - I was calling the shills to challenge me! None took me up on my offer for the reason you’re about to find out why:

You think you’re smart - let me help you realize where you rank on the scale. Yes, the mod’s post about the banning of the word could’ve better stated - perhaps the mod underestimated how many non critical thinkers this site is actually full of. You being one of them!

Isn’t there a rule against racism on this site?! You think it’s just a word, but don’t all words have meaning?! Some words were only created for the sole purpose of expressing hate against races of people. To think it’s about simply ‘banning an offensive word so what’s next’ - goes to show how dumbed down people are. Which is how the elite is able to keep us under control, wouldn’t you agree?

Having the ability for higher thought processing is probably why you assume I’m a facebook boomer? I’m not sure how you came to that conclusion... you’ll need to bring me down to your level so I can respond; this is where logic comes into play. But the fact that you really think 50mil “Facebook boomers” is posting how great censorship is, is truly telling! There’s no way you’re that clueless? You said you came from the chans, right? Well, how many of those 50mil ‘censorship’ supporters you think are shills? Don’t worry, it’s only a rhetorical question because you can’t possibly apply logic to answer it when you don’t even understand the concept of censorship. Here’s how I know you don’t:

Besides the original post from tris... whatever their name was, yesterday was not about Joggers. It was about censoring speak of JEWS. Not the term JEW. But the talk about Jews. See how censorship is a slippery slope that never stops?

You see, the reason the “talk about Jews” as you call it was “censored” was because it was hateful - in other words: racist! And isn’t racism against the rules of this forum? I challenge you to think: how does censorship apply in this situation? Give you a hint: it doesn’t!

If you are a genuine Q supporter you’d understand the mission of this forum and why the word was banned... it was obviously being used by counterproductive ‘Q supporters.’

Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement!

No doubt it does! It seems a new tactic is to try and make Q supporters look dumb - most of you complaining about being censored on a private site for not allowing the promotion of racism falls in this category. You think you’re supporting Q but your contributions to the movement says otherwise. I would’ve been fine just being a site lurker... but I’m enjoying calling out the shills who think they’re so smart. Why the hell do you think I have so many downvotes?! To me, this is a good sign! LOL

I could go on to point out other things you stated in your post that doesn’t make sense, but it’ll be too long. Don’t want to risk the message being overlooked by anyone willing to receive it. But thank you for proving my point that you don’t have the mental capacity to process complex information.

Oh, and hasn’t jogger been identified as a ‘secure’ way to circumvent the banning of the word for which it replaced? To be clear - the context in which you used the word is what makes it racist. Just like how “the speak of Jews” was banned even when no ‘forbidden’ words were used. Deporting!

But remember what I said: every word has a meaning. Now let me blow your mind: when the spelling is changed, so does the meaning, however slight (e.g., run/ran, dummy/dummies)... but when it’s combined with other words to form a sentence - this is where it gets complicated! The meaning of every word, the placement of the words in the sentence, let’s not start combining sentences, way too much to process. But let me leave you with this: please don’t let the fact that you were out smarted by, as you call a “jogger” deepen your feelings of hatred. Let it go. Having hatred in your heart prevents you from experiencing the full effect of love.